Why would two close stars have similar metallicity, but different color?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quarky2001
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Color Stars
quarky2001
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
This is the exact question:

Stars in a globular cluster are observed to be one magnitude redder (in terms of B-V color, so the color excess E_(B-V) = 1, and extinction in the V band is 3.1) than other nearby stars having similar metallicity. What causes this?


I'm aware of why two stars might have different metallicity - one being older than the other means it incorporated less iron from the ISM during formation. I don't understand why two stars with the same metallicity, and from the same part of a galaxy, would have significantly different color.

Does it just relate to their size and temperature? If so, I'm not sure why the question would bother to invoke the concept of metallicity, except to ask that we ignore it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quarky2001 said:
Does it just relate to their size and temperature? If so, I'm not sure why the question would bother to invoke the concept of metallicity, except to ask that we ignore it.
Yes.
 
Thanks for the reply - I asked the professor today. He just worded the question funny. By "nearby", he meant that the globular cluster's stars were redder than other stars of similar metallicity "nearby" the solar system, not nearby other stars in the globular cluster!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top