Will the 2 dimensional sphere rotate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicS FAN
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotate Sphere
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around whether a 200kg sphere will rotate when a 400N force is applied, given the friction conditions with two walls. The key point is that the torque generated by the applied force must exceed the torque from the frictional force at the vertical wall, which is limited by the coefficient of friction (μ=0.25). Theoretical proof indicates that the normal force from the vertical wall is insufficient to create balance, leading to the conclusion that the sphere will not rotate. Participants emphasize the importance of accurately balancing forces and torques to solve the problem. Ultimately, the consensus is that the sphere remains stationary due to the insufficient torque from the frictional force.
PhysicS FAN
Messages
26
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


A 200kg sphere is in touch with two walls. The horizontal wall has no coefficent of friction and the vertical has μ=0.25. If we apply a force F=400N will the sphere rotate?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

[/B]
What I can't understand is, if there is balance in the y and x-axis beacuse if so the problem is easily solved. I proved it theoritically but I can not find a mathematical solution. Please help me.
 

Attachments

  • WIN_20190222_14_03_35_Pro (2).jpg
    WIN_20190222_14_03_35_Pro (2).jpg
    13.4 KB · Views: 376
Physics news on Phys.org
I am missing a force (*) in your drawing. Can you post your theoretical proof ?

[edit] (*) unless the B has a specific meaning
 
BvU said:
I am missing a force (*) in your drawing. Can you post your theoretical proof ?

[edit] (*) unless the B has a specific meaning
Sorry my fault, B is representing a point not a force. The theoritical proof is that in order for the sphere to rotate, the torque of F should be bigger than the torque of T. Its clear that both T and F are in the same distance from the center K which means we can now compare F and T as forces. The biggest value of T is always less than F since T=μ*N=0.25*N and N the reaction of the verticall wall is not big enough to cause balance.
 
PhysicS FAN said:
torque of T
Good you mention it. I can now even distinguish a T in the picture.

I agree with your reasoning and wonder why you have difficulty with the force balances: if you write then in full (i.e. ##\ \vec a = \displaystyle \sum \vec F\ \ ##) there should be no problem. Clearly there is no acceleration to the right, so the reaction force from the wall to the left is equal to F. That gives you the magnitude of T as you used it.

[edit] the next line is based on a wrong assumption:
Note that even when ##\mu = 1 \;##, nothing happens since the sum of vertical forces won't exceed 0.

[edit] the wrong assumption being: nothing happens with ##\mu = 0.25 \;##
 
  • Like
Likes PhysicS FAN
BvU said:
Good you mention it. I can now even distinguish a T in the picture.

I agree with your reasoning and wonder why you have difficulty with the force balances: if you write then in full (i.e. ##\ \vec a = \displaystyle \sum \vec F\ \ ##) there should be no problem. Clearly there is no acceleration to the right, so the reaction force from the wall to the left is equal to F. That gives you the magnitude of T as you used it.

Note that even when ##\mu = 1 \;##, nothing happens since the sum of vertical forces won't exceed 0.
Yeah
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top