Will the Safe Tip Over During the Emergency Stop?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drespar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a safe in a truck during an emergency stop. The safe, resting against a ledge while the truck decelerates sharply, raises questions about the forces acting on it, particularly the shifting normal force and the conditions required for it to tip over. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding torque and the pivot point at the ledge's edge, noting that the safe's weight distribution affects its stability. Clarifications are sought regarding the dimensions of the safe and the role of friction in this scenario. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the need for a clear analysis of forces and torques to determine the tipping conditions of the safe.
Drespar
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A safe is in the back of a truck resting against a ledge that is .0381 m high. The truck is traveling at a velocity of approx. 29.1 m/s (about 65 mph). The driver then is forced to make an emergency stop, causing a negative acceleration of -6.86 m/s2. (solved for the acceleration with friction and velocity).

What will the safe do?

The safe's mass: 1063kg
Friction Coefficient (safe on truck bed): .8

Homework Equations



Force(net)x = 0

Force(net)y = 0

Torque(net) = r χ F

The Attempt at a Solution



As it stands, I have tried to construct an extended Force & Torque diagram. The pivot point of the system is located at the top of the ledge. The object is not accelerating in either the x or y direction so the net force in those directions is 0.

My main issue, is why is the normal force shifted (I have looked for explanations, they show the normal force has shifted towards the pivot, but they don't say why). Additionally, I do not know how to solve the equation for the minimum force required to tip the safe.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
As it stands, I have tried to construct an extended Force & Torque diagram. The pivot point of the system is located at the top of the ledge. The object is not accelerating in either the x or y direction so the net force in those directions is 0.

My main issue, is why is the normal force shifted (I have looked for explanations, they show the normal force has shifted towards the pivot, but they don't say why). Additionally, I do not know how to solve the equation for the minimum force required to tip the safe.
... I cannot tell what you have tried from just this.
You sound confused - start again from the beginning and go through it slowly.

The truck slams on the breaks ... the truck slows sharply... but the law of inertia means...
 
Is that all the info given? Is there a missing diagram?

Which side of the safe is the ledge? In front or behind? (It's not clear why you are given the coefficient of friction and a ledge).

Is the width and height of the safe given?

As it stands, I have tried to construct an extended Force & Torque diagram. The pivot point of the system is located at the top of the ledge. The object is not accelerating in either the x or y direction so the net force in those directions is 0.

Why do you say that? If the safe isn't decelerating then there is no force causing it to tip over.

My main issue, is why is the normal force shifted (I have looked for explanations, they show the normal force has shifted towards the pivot, but they don't say why).

Because if it's just about to tip up "all the weight" is at the edge near the pivot and none onder the back edge. See youtube for video of motor bike doing a nose stand. As the back wheel is just about to lift off ground all the weight is on the front wheel.

Additionally, I do not know how to solve the equation for the minimum force required to tip the safe.

At the point where it's just about to tip over the torque will sum to zero. Any more torque in the forward direction and it will tip over.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top