Wind load - is it a FORCE or PRESSURE?

AI Thread Summary
Wind load on buildings is primarily considered a pressure rather than a force, as it is defined by the impact of wind on surfaces like walls and roofs. The relationship between pressure and force is established through the equation P = F/A, indicating that pressure is the force distributed over an area. Wind, being a fluid flow, is better described by pressure measurements, which capture the dynamic effects of the wind rather than just the force exerted. While some definitions refer to wind load as a force, this can lead to confusion since wind itself is a phenomenon rather than a direct force acting on a surface. Understanding wind load as pressure allows for a more accurate assessment of its impact on structures.
joeykeys
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Explain if wind on walls and roofs of buildings is considered a pressure or a force?


Homework Equations



P = F/A


The Attempt at a Solution



Wind load should be measured in terms of pressure?..but I don't know the exact reason why it is. Does it have something to do with "non-contact" force?..


Thanks for your time for the explanation!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do we have to consider wind as pressure or force, when it is defined as the flow of the gas, which means it is a phenomenon?
 
Do you mean that measure of the flow of gas/liquid must be in term of "pressure" but not "force"?
 
No (I don't know why the word "pressure" was underlined).
You may describe the state of the flow at a point with many quantities, such as velocity of the element of the gas at that point, pressure of the gas, etc. Flow means motion, and so, it cannot be measured; it can only be described.
 
How would you comment on the "wind load" on buildings then?
Is it a pressure but not a force?
 
I've just googled a little bit and found that people defined "wind load" as force, which means there should be something getting hit by the wind. But when you mention wind, it's neither force nor pressure.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top