Winning at Amusement Park Game: Varying Velocities

  • Thread starter Thread starter quick
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a puck on a frictionless ramp, where the objective is to determine if the puck can reach within 10 cm of the ramp's end after being pushed. Participants explain that the puck experiences constant acceleration, which can be calculated using the initial and final velocities along with the distances traveled. The conservation of energy equation is also suggested as a method to find acceleration. One user successfully calculates the acceleration as 0.84 m/s² after clarifying the position measurements. The conversation emphasizes understanding the direction of acceleration and correctly interpreting the ramp's position for accurate calculations.
quick
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
One game at the amusement park has you push a puck up a long, frictionless ramp. You win a stuffed animal if the puck, at its highest point, comes to within 10 cm of the end of the ramp without going off. You give the puck a push, releasing it with a speed of 5.0 m/s when it is 8.50 m from the end of the ramp. The puck's speed after traveling 3.0 m is 4.0 m/s.

Am I a winner or not?

Please explain how to do this problem. thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's something to start you off.

Along the ramp, the puck experiences a constant acceleration. (Why?)
With your data (namely, the velocity and position at two different events), you can determine this acceleration.
Given the velocity at your final event, you can determine the position of that final event.

You can also do this using "conservation of energy".
 
so i use the equation:
v_f^2 = v_i^2 + 2a(x_f - x_i)
and solve for a?

i tried with the following values:

4^2 = 5^2 + 2a(5.5 - 8.5) {this part was kind of confusing since the way they give the positions is '8.5m from the end of the ramp' and then 'after traveling 3.0m') after solving for a i got .84
 
That's a good equation to use.

Assuming "up the ramp" to be the positive direction, I would have expected the component of acceleration along the ramp to be negative. Try calling the "end of the ramp" "0 cm" and the initial position "-850. cm".
 
awesome i got it. thanks for your help!
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top