Wire rope and pulley sheave resistance calculation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the resistance for a system using stainless steel wire rope and multiple sheaves to lift a platform weighing 430Kg. The user seeks clarification on how to account for friction in the sheaves, specifically with a K value of 1.09, and whether this frictional loss compounds with multiple sheaves. It is confirmed that each sheave experiences friction, requiring the load to be multiplied by 1.09 for each sheave, leading to a total multiplier of approximately 2.36736 for ten sheaves. Additionally, a safety factor of 5 is suggested to ensure adequate lifting capacity. The user is encouraged to apply these calculations to determine the necessary force for the hydraulic ram.
Alan Goodchild
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, this is my first posting on this forum in the hope someone could assist me with a calculation.

I have read several threads which I think partly covers my problem but to be honest the example answers given are way beyond my comprehension.

Basically I need to raise a platform which runs on two vertical tracks by the use of stainless steel wire rope which runs over and around a series of sheaves to a hydraulic ram. Space dictates the maximum ram stroke I can accommodate is 600mm and I need a vertical lift of 2m. The total load including the platform is 430Kg so I have come up with a workable solution based upon an earlier unit I built. Although this only had one sheave so the calculation was within my scope with a bit of guesswork for resistance.

I have tried to find out the resistance of the pulley sheaves which are 75mm dia. from the supplier, but they are rather vague and suggest I allow between 5 - 10% on top? However, reading some earlier threads I have seen one reference for plain bearing sheaves, K = 1.09.

I am attaching a diagram which I hope explains the principal of this design, if anyone is able to assist in plain English what push the ram (in Kg) is needed it would be extremely helpful.

Many thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
I think the interpretation of K is this: suppose you have a single sheave, which suspends a load W. If this were a frictionless sheave, then the force F required to move the load would be F = W. However, to overcome friction is a sheave which has a K value of 1.09, then the force required to move the load would be F = K*W = 1.09 W.
 
Hi, I sort of understand that if the value of K is 1.09 I need to add 9% to the weight being lifted, but what confuses me is if you look at my diagram there are 10 sheaves on the lift wire to achieve the required lift with a ram stroke of 600mm. Therefore does the increase of 9% apply to every sheave in the system as a compound increase or am I missing something. Clearly my ultimate aim is to to specify a ram with sufficient output force to cope with the raising of 430Kg.

Any help in showing me how to calculate this would be much appreciated and thanks for your reply.
 
Yes, every sheave will experience a frictional loss.
 
Okay, if you could please clarify how I approach the calculation: Do I simply multiply 215 x 1.09 (19.35) and multiply the answer by10 which is then added to the 215, or does the 215 x 1.09 = 234.35 then have the multiplier of 1.09 added again (255.4415) and continue this for 10 times to arrive at the final force?

Sorry being really thick here but have researched so much now even the answers are confusing me!
 
Each sheaf 'sees' the force as an input and you need to multiply that by 1.09 (pretty good sheaf incidentally) to account for the sheaf losses.
So overall, if you have 10 sheaves in the system, the end to end force needed to lift the load and account for the losses will be the load times 1.09**10, or load times 2.36736, according to Wolfram.
You might reasonably think about using a factor of 5, just to leave a margin of safety in your setup.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top