Work and kinetic friction coefficient

In summary, the block slides down a hill and comes to a complete stop due to friction after traveling over a rough patch. Its kinetic friction coefficient is 0.08, its average acceleration is 8.64 m/s, and its speed at the bottom of the hill is 6.57 m/s.
  • #1
DoctorB2B
15
0

Homework Statement


A block slides down a frictionless hill, h=1.8m high. At the top of the hill the block has a speed of v=2.8m/s. At the bottom of the hill, the block travels over a patch of rough pavement and comes to a complete stop after s=5.0m distance due to friction.

a) What is the coefficient of kinetic friction between the pavement and the block at the bottom of the hill?

b) What is the magnitude of the averge acceleration of the block while traveling over the rough patch?

Homework Equations


Fk=ukmg
Wf=ukmg x s
Work energy theorem: W=0.5mv22-0.5mv12

The Attempt at a Solution


It seems that something is missing from this equation. Isn't mass a necessity here? Also, I'm not sure where to factor in the height of the hill into this equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
First try to calculate the block's speed at the bottom of the hill.

Hint: the mass of the block is irrelevant - it will cancel out. Try it and see what happens.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Conservation of energy

DoctorB2B said:
A block slides down a frictionless hill, h=1.8m high. At the top of the hill the block has a speed of v=2.8m/s.
The first step is to calculate the block's total energy at the top of the hill. The hill is frictionless, so the block's energy is conserved as it slides down the hill. That means you can calculate the block's speed when it reaches the bottom of the hill.
At the bottom of the hill, the block travels over a patch of rough pavement
Isn't mass a necessity here?
Don't worry about that yet. Just start working on the problem and see what happens.
 
  • #4
Okay, I think I've gotten the kinetic friction coefficient by using the formula s=v2/uk2g which gave me 0.08.


I am however a tad lost when it comes to determining average acceleration.
 
  • #5
I approached this problem differently than you - I found the average acceleration first.

But anyway, you're using that formula incorrectly, because that's from your speed at the TOP of the hill.

You need the speed at the bottom. Then you will be able to use your formula.
 
  • #6
then I'm lost ... because it seems like there are variables missing. If I'm to solve for average acceleration, don't I need an angle so I can determine the length of the hill?
 
  • #7
first the hill, then friction

You can't solve this problem in one step. There are two parts to it: accelerating down the hill, and then slowing down at the bottom. You need to find the block's speed when it reaches the bottom of the hill before you can analyze what happens to it in the rough patch.
 
  • #8
Sorry, I think I confused you. Forget about the average acceleration for a minute.

Let's first just worry about the speed at the bottom of the hill. You do this using conservation of energy calculations.

Remember, total initial energy = total final energy.

What kinds of energy does the block have at the top of the hill?

What does it have at the bottom?
 
  • #9
At the top of the hill, the block has kinetic energy and at the bottom it has potential energy due to lack of movement.
 
  • #10
No, not quite.

Whenever something is in motion (aka whenever it has a speed) it has kinetic energy.

Whenever something has height, it has gravitational potential energy.

At the top of the hill, does the block have motion? Yes, so it has kinetic energy. Does it have height? Yes, it is 1.8 m in the air. So, it has gravitational potential energy.

At the bottom of the hill, the block still has movement! It doesn't just stop when it gets to the bottom - it continues moving for 5 seconds, right? So it has kinetic energy.

But - the block has no height anymore! If it has zero height, it has zero potential energy.

How can you put this information into a formula?
 
  • #11
k ... so it goes a little something like this then: K1 + Ugrav = K2.

The mass cancels on both sides leaving (0.5vi2+gh)=0.5vf2 where the velocity at the bottom of the hill is 6.57m/s.
 
  • #12
Yes, that's right!

(Be careful, though - what you have at the bottom of the hill is a speed, not a velocity).

Now, you can use that formula you had before to find the coefficient of kinetic friction.

You can find acceleration, too, because you know the block starts with a speed of 6.57 m/s, travels 5.0 m, and ends with a speed of 0 m/s.
 
  • #13
coefficient = 0.44

average acc. = (6.57m/s-0m/s)/0.76s = 8.64m/s2
 
  • #14
0.44 is correct, but your acceleration isn't. Double check that time you found.
 
  • #15
am I using 6.57 and 0 as v1 and v2 respectively?
 
  • #16
Yes.
 
  • #17
Thanks for all your help!
 

FAQ: Work and kinetic friction coefficient

1. What is the difference between work and kinetic friction coefficient?

The work friction coefficient is a measure of the energy required to overcome static friction and initiate motion between two surfaces. On the other hand, the kinetic friction coefficient is a measure of the resistance to motion between two surfaces that are already in motion.

2. How is the work friction coefficient determined?

The work friction coefficient is determined by dividing the force required to overcome static friction by the weight of the object.

3. What factors affect the value of the kinetic friction coefficient?

The value of the kinetic friction coefficient is affected by the types of surfaces in contact, the roughness of the surfaces, and the force pressing the surfaces together.

4. How do you calculate the kinetic friction force?

The kinetic friction force can be calculated by multiplying the kinetic friction coefficient by the normal force between the two surfaces.

5. How does the kinetic friction coefficient impact the motion of an object?

The kinetic friction coefficient determines the amount of resistance an object will experience while in motion. A higher coefficient means greater resistance and a lower coefficient means less resistance. This can affect the speed and acceleration of the object.

Back
Top