Work and Power of 1.83x10^3 kg Car Accelerating from Rest

PepeF.
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a 1.83x10^3 kg car accelerates uniformly from rest to 13.6m/s in 2.81 s

-what is the work done on the car in this time inerval?

-what is the power delivered by the engine in thsi time interval?



Homework Equations



w=f*d
p=w/t

The Attempt at a Solution



i did the first one, but could not be able to come up with the answer
i multiplied gravity x mass = f then fxd=246568 and its wrong
can you please explain or tell me how to get it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PepeF. said:

Homework Statement


a 1.83x10^3 kg car accelerates uniformly from rest to 13.6m/s in 2.81 s

-what is the work done on the car in this time inerval?

-what is the power delivered by the engine in thsi time interval?



Homework Equations



w=f*d
p=w/t

The Attempt at a Solution



i did the first one, but could not be able to come up with the answer
i multiplied gravity x mass = f then fxd=246568 and its wrong
can you please explain or tell me how to get it

Because your acceleration is not gravity, it is the acceleration that is implied in the problem:

<br /> a=\frac{v_f-v_0}{t}=\frac{13.6m/s-0m/s}{2.81s}=4.84m/s^2<br />
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top