Work done by a force changing the distance of a satellite's orbit

AI Thread Summary
To change a satellite's orbit from a radius of 1.81 × 10^7 m to 8.01 × 10^6 m, a net external force must perform work on the satellite. The initial and final orbital speeds were calculated using the formula v = sqrt(G * M_e / r), resulting in speeds of 4695.74 m/s and 7058.74 m/s, respectively. The work done was computed using the Work-Kinetic Energy Theorem, yielding a value of approximately 7.68 × 10^10 J. However, there is a concern about whether other forms of energy, besides kinetic energy, should be considered in this calculation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accounting for all energy types when determining the work required for orbital changes.
kmb11132
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 5530-kg satellite is in a circular Earth orbit that has a radius of 1.81 × 10^7 m. A net external force must act on the satellite to make it change to a circular orbit that has a radius of 8.01 × 10^6 m. What work must the net external force do?

Homework Equations



Orbital Speed:
v = sqrt( G * M_e / r )
where G is the gravitational constant and M_e is Earth's mass

Work-Kinetic Energy Theorem:
W = K_f - K_i = .5*m*v_f^2 - .5*m*v_i^2

The Attempt at a Solution



v_i = sqrt( 6.674e-11 * 5.98e24kg / 1.81e7m )
v_i = 4695.74m/s

v_f = sqrt( 6.674e-11 * 5.98e24kg / 8.01e6m )
v_f = 7058.74m/s

W = .5*m*v_f^2 - .5*m*v_i^2
W = .5*5530kg*7058.74m/s^2 - .5*5530kg*4695.74m/s^2
W = 7.68002e10J
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Work = change in energy.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Work = change in energy.

I incorrectly found the work to be the difference between the initial and final kinetic energies above.
 
Are there other forms of energy present?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top