Work Done by Spring at A: Calculating from Position 2 to Position 3

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work done by a torsion spring as a uniform bar rotates from position 2 to position 3. The correct approach involves integrating the counterclockwise couple function, C(θ) = -10θ, with appropriate limits of integration based on the equilibrium position. The initial calculation yielded -3.8 N·m, but the correct answer is -8.38 N·m, highlighting the importance of accurately setting integration limits relative to the equilibrium position. Participants emphasize the need to consider equilibrium conditions in solving such problems. Overall, understanding the relationship between positions and equilibrium is crucial for accurate calculations.
maniac90
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The torsion spring at A applies the counterclockwise couple C(θ)= − 10θ N · m to the uniform bar.The angle θ (in radians) is measured counterclockwise
from position 1, where the spring is undeformed.

Calculate the work done by the spring on the bar as it rotates from position 2 to position 3.

http://img849.imageshack.us/img849/1696/182z.jpg


Homework Equations



U1-2 = ∫C dθ

U1-2 = C(θ2 − θ1)= C Δθ

The Attempt at a Solution



U1-2 = ∫− 10θ dθ = -10∫θ dθ

= -10 (1/2) θ2

50° = 5π/18 rad

U1-2 = -3.8

I am not sure if that is the correct way of solving it, any guidance would be helpful
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks right to me.
 
I just checked the book. The answer says it is −8.38 N·m
I can't figure out what I am doing wrong
 
Oh, here's the issue. Sorry I didn't check more closely before. I think your limits of integration were off. It should be

W = \int^{\theta = 4\pi/9}_{\theta = \pi/6} -10\theta d\theta

because the equilibrium position of the system is at position 1, where \theta = 0. You want to find the work done by the spring moving from position 2 (\theta = \frac{\pi}{6}, relative to position 1) to position 3 (\theta = \frac{4\pi}{9}, with respect to position 1).
 
So the moral of the story is that it's highly important to take into account your equilibrium conditions and how the interactions occur relative to the equilibrium conditions. It's also important for people who answer questions on PF not to get ahead of themselves and forget (like I did here) to check that the approach the OP takes is duly considerate of the equilibrium conditions and their relation to the conditions stated as the bounds of the problem.
 
That helped me a lot. Thank you very much
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top