Work done in an Isobaric expansion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a thermodynamics problem involving nitrogen gas undergoing an isobaric expansion and subsequent pressure decrease at constant volume. Participants clarify the calculations for heat transfer during the expansion and the resulting changes in pressure and temperature. Key equations like the ideal gas law (PV=nRT) and work done during expansion (W=-p(ΔV)) are utilized, with corrections made to the number of moles of nitrogen gas. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately determining variables and applying the first law of thermodynamics to solve for heat transfer and work done. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of thermodynamic processes and the need for precise calculations.
iceman_ch
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



4.20g of nitrogen gas at 22.0 C and an initial pressure of 2.30 atm undergo an isobaric expansion until the volume has tripled.

A.)How much heat energy is transferred to the gas to cause this expansion?

b.)The gas pressure is then decreased at constant volume until the original temperature is reached. What is the gas pressure after the decrease?

c.)What amount of heat energy is transferred from the gas as its pressure decreases?


Homework Equations



Pv=nRT

W=-p(delta V)



The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so here is all of the steps that I take. I know it seems like I do more then I need to but I get all of the information I can in these problems so that I can memorize the ways to do it so here goes.

First the infromation that I have is

M = .0042kg
R=8.31
Ti = 295K (22+273)
Pi= 2.3 atm = (101325 * 2.3) = 233047.5
An= 14u = (14 * 1.661 x 10^-27) = 2.33 x 10^-26 Kg
M/kg = 2.33 x 10^-26 * 6.02 x 10^23 = .014 Kg
n= .3 mol
Vi= (.3 * 8.31 * 295)/233047.5 = .00315 m^3
Vf= .00315 * 3 = .00947

This is where I'm having a hard time. The equation I have tried using is

W=-p(delta V)

-233047.5 * (.00315 - .00947) = 1472.86 (this answer is wrong)

So what am I doing wrong?

So here is some more work that I have doen.

W=nR(deltaT) = 590.79
Tf= 590.79 + 22 = 612 C = 612 +273 = 885 K (That seems a little hot I'm pretty sure its not right but I can' get any other answer.)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
=iceman_ch;1310103
First the infromation that I have is

M = .0042kg
R=8.31
Ti = 295K (22+273)
Pi= 2.3 atm = (101325 * 2.3) = 233047.5
An= 14u = (14 * 1.661 x 10^-27) = 2.33 x 10^-26 Kg
M/kg = 2.33 x 10^-26 * 6.02 x 10^23 = .014 Kg
n= .3 mol
Vi= (.3 * 8.31 * 295)/233047.5 = .00315 m^3
Vf= .00315 * 3 = .00947

There is a MUCH easier way to convert mass into moles!
#moles = mass of substance / atomic weight of molecule
Your n value is wrong. Remember that there are TWO nitrogen atoms in a molecule of nitrogen gas.
 
Last edited:
ok then that would make my n

n= .15 mol
Vi= .00158 m^3
Vf= .00474 m^3
W= 736.43 (which is also a wrong answer.)
I used W=-p(Vi-Vf)
 
I am sorry I can't really follow the work. Please include the units.

I would approach this problem this way...

First of all, I would sketch a P-V diagram. It starts at some pressure and volume and then undergoes an isobaric expansion tripling its side. With p on your vertical axis and v on horizontal axis on the diagram, draw the a horizontal line a across. If PV=nRT and p is constant P(3V)=nR(3T) right?
Knowing this, we know that if volume (3v) is constant the temperature drops back to T, P must drop to 1/3 P. Draw a vertical line down. The temperature is the same as the beginning so it will under an isothermal compression back to the original point.

Are you familiar with the first law of thermodynamic. du=dQ-dw where du=nC_p*dt and dw=n*C_v*dt? You are right that dw = p*dv

a)

the nitrogen undergoes an isobaric expansion to three times its original volume. nC_p*dt = n*C_v*dt - p*dv. then dq=n*C_v*dt = nC_p*dt+p*dv

b) We know that the compression is isochoric, meaning volume is not changed. Work is area under the curve so it is zero. du=dQ = n*C_v*dt

c) This is the isothermal compression. Again, use du= dQ-dw.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top