Work done on the jet by the catapult

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done on a fighter jet by a catapult during its launch from an aircraft carrier. The thrust of the jet's engines is given as 3.14 x 10^5 N, and it achieves a kinetic energy of 5.63 x 10^7 J after moving 85.1 m. Participants suggest using the work-energy principle, noting that the total work equals the change in kinetic energy, factoring in the work done by the engines. The work done by the catapult can be determined by subtracting the work done by the engines from the total kinetic energy at lift-off. The conversation emphasizes understanding the relationship between work, energy, and the forces involved in the launch process.
kittymaniac84
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A fighter jet is launched from an aircraft carrier with the aid of its own engines and a steam-powered catapult. The thrust of its engines is 3.14 x 10^5 N. In being launched from rest it moves through a distance of 85.1 m and has a kinetic energy of 5.63 x 10^7 J at lift-off. What is the work done on the jet by the catapult?


Homework Equations



w=sumF*displacement=0.5mv^{2}_{f}-0.5mv^{2}_{o}

The Attempt at a Solution



I am unsure how to start this. They don't give me the final velocity or the mass. so I don't think i can use that equation. Is this a tricky question? Is the answer 5.63 x 10^7 J or 5.63 x 10^7 J times 85.1m= 4.79 x 10^9
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can calculate the word done by the engines with:
W = Fd

Then subtract it from the final kinetic energy, the remainder will be the work done by the catapult.
 
so, considering there's no atrit and no potencial energy variation and that fuel is massless , have 2 vital information:
W=sum(F*r)
total work=delta Energy(in case Potencial energy=constant, total work=delta kinectic Energy).

So, you have
Energy in the begin and Energy in the end

and than you know that total work=W1+W2 (where W1 is work of jets and W2 work of catapult)

I guess you have all...(i don't make the calculations as i prefer letters ratter than numbers...)
 
ok that makes sense now. thank you
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top