Work on 1 pulley system and two masses

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a dynamics problem involving a pulley system with two masses, questioning why the work done by gravity is considered positive for both masses despite one moving up and the other down. It highlights that the assumption of both masses moving down is crucial for consistent energy calculations, as using one mass going up leads to incorrect results. The tension in the rope is noted to do zero work because it acts as a reaction force, which does not contribute to energy changes in the system. Additionally, the concept of reaction forces and their ability to do work is questioned, seeking clarification on examples. Understanding these principles is essential for correctly analyzing the dynamics of the system.
whatname
Messages
2
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


this is from an example problem in the hibbler dynamics book 13th edition in the section of work so i don't really have a question on how to do it. the question is why is the problem solved the way it is solved.

the system has one pulley.one rope.and two masses at each end of the rope the work done by gravity is positive for both masses...why?. since one mass is going up and the other mass down. shouldn't work by gravity be negative for the mass going up?
i assign positive going down.

Homework Equations


work done on an object = the change in the objects KE

The Attempt at a Solution


i solved with kinematic equations and found the answers match. so I know its correct to assume that both masses go down with energy equations, but if I try to solve with one mass going up (and so work by gravity is negative on that one)and the other down (so work by gravity is positive on this one) using energy equations I get a different/wrong answer. so why must both masses be assumed to move down? is it because of the rope? How? also, tension does zero work. Why? is it because its a reaction force? can reaction forces do work?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you please provide a diagram and show us your work? Thanks.
 
this more of a concept question not a how to do it question since this is an example problem and the solution with step by step solution is already provided. all I am asking is 1.)why must it be assumed that both masses move down and how can it be done with 1 mass going up and the other down using cons. of energy. 2.) why doesn't the tension in the cord do work.3) do reaction forces do work? if so what's an example of one?
 
whatname said:
this more of a concept question not a how to do it question since this is an example problem and the solution with step by step solution is already provided. all I am asking is 1.)why must it be assumed that both masses move down and how can it be done with 1 mass going up and the other down using cons. of energy. 2.) why doesn't the tension in the cord do work.3) do reaction forces do work? if so what's an example of one?
I agree with you. For one of the masses, the potential energy increases, and for the other mass, the potential energy decreases. Any possibility of your typing out the solution they gave so that I can see exactly what they did? It's very hard to address your question without seeing more details.

Chet
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top