Work with Pulleys: Questions & Answers

  • Thread starter Thread starter mbrmbrg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulleys Work
AI Thread Summary
To lift the canister at a constant speed, the force exerted must equal the weight of the canister, which is calculated using its mass. When lifting the canister by 1.9 cm, the free end of the cord must be pulled twice that distance due to the mechanics of the pulley system. The work done on the canister by the applied force is determined by the distance pulled, while the work done by gravity is based on the height the canister is lifted. Understanding these concepts can be challenging, particularly in distinguishing between the distance the cord is pulled and the distance the canister moves. Clarifying these mechanics is essential for solving pulley-related problems effectively.
mbrmbrg
Messages
485
Reaction score
2
In Figure 7-48 (see attatched), a cord runs around two massless, frictionless pulleys. A canister with mass m = 11 kg hangs from one pulley, and you exert a force F on the free end of the cord:

(a) What must be the magnitude of F if you are to lift the canister at a constant speed?
(b) To lift the canister by 1.9 cm, how far must you pull the free end of the cord?
(c) During that lift, what is the work done on the canister by your force (via the cord)?
(d) What is the work done on the canister by the gravitational force on the canister?

I don't like pulleys. Can I just pretend that the applied force acts directly on the canister and points straight up? I'm fairly certain that's OK for parts (a) and (c), but I'm not so sure about part (b).
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
W-oah. I have the problem from WebAssign; I finally flipped through my textbook (Halliday, 7e) in the vague hope that the book would provide inspiration. It adds a helpful little line at the end of the problem: "(Hint: When a cord loops around a pulley as shown, it pulls on the pulley with a net force that is twice the tension in the cord.)"
Was I supposed to figure that out by myself?
And does that mean that I can indeed imagine the applied force as acting directly on the canister, but it points up and has twice the magnitude of the pulling-on-rope force?

BTW, my attatchment still says that it's pending approval, but I can download it no problem.
 
Last edited:
Hokey-dokey. I got it all right, and I even know how I got it all right. But I'm not quite sure why it all worked.

Take part (b): just multiply the distance by two. But why? How would I have figured that out other than looking in the back of the book and working backwards to figure out how they manipulated their numbers to get their answer?

For part (c), W=Fxcosphi=Fx*1. Why is x the distance you pull rather than the distance the can moves? Same for part (d)
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
28K
Replies
3
Views
18K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top