Worldlines and spacetime diagrams

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics homework problem involving spacetime diagrams and worldlines in special relativity. An observer on a spaceship experiences proper acceleration, leading to a specific worldline described by hyperbolic functions. When a radio beacon is released, it remains at rest relative to the observer at that moment, and its worldline is drawn on the spacetime diagram. The emission of signal pulses from the beacon is analyzed, leading to the derivation of a four-vector for the emission event and discussions on the properties of the beacon's trajectory post-release. The conversation also touches on the implications of null vectors and the relationship between time and position for the received pulse, with participants confirming their understanding of the concepts and calculations involved.
alc95
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An observer on the bridge of a spaceship is undergoing a proper acceleration a, so that the
observer’s worldline expressed in terms of the coordinates of an inertial reference frame S
is given by
t(\tau)=(c/a)\sinh(a\tau/c)x(\tau)=(c^2/a)\sinh(a\tau/c)
(a) Draw on a spacetime diagram for the reference frame S the worldline of the observer
for tau > 0.
At the instant tau = 0 a radio beacon is dropped off by the observer. At the instant of being
dropped off, the beacon is at rest relative to the observer. At this instant the beacon also
starts emitting at regular intervals (according to a clock on the beacon) a series of very short
pulses towards the observer.
Consider the signal pulse emitted at a time tE in the reference frame S.

(b) Draw on the spacetime diagram of part (a) the worldline of the beacon. Hence show
that this emission event has the spacetime cordinates (ct_E,x_E)=(ct_E,c^2/a)
(c) Show that the spacetime displacement of this emission event with respect to the origin
of S is given by the four vector
<br /> \textbf{s}_E=ct_E\textbf{e}_0+(c^2/a)\textbf{e}_1<br />
(d) Draw on the spacetime diagram the world line of the pulse emitted at time tE:

Homework Equations


<br /> (\cosh(x))^2-(\sinh(x))^2=1<br />

A four vector is defined as:
<br /> \textbf{s}=\Delta ct\textbf{e}_0+\Delta x\textbf{e}_1+\Delta y\textbf{e}_2+\Delta z\textbf{e}_3<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


(a)
Rearranging the given equations:
\sinh(a\tau/c)=at/c\cosh(a\tau/c)=ax/c^2
Substituting into the relation between sinh and cosh:
(ax/c^2)^2-(at/c)^2=1(a^2x^2-a^2c^2t^2)/c^4=1x^2=c^2t^2+c^4/a^2 (1)

(b)
when tau=0:
t(0)=0x(0)=c^2/a
this part I'm not so sure of, but here is what I did:
using the equation of motion x_f=x_i+ut+(1/2)at^2x = -½ac^2t^2 + c^2/a
rearranging:
ct=\sqrt{(c^2/a-x)/(a/2)} (2)

I'm not quite sure of my solutions for (a) and (b). Assuming I have the correct equations (1) and (2), all that remains is to plot them on the same plot of ct vs x?

(c)
substituting the spacetime coordinates (ct_E,c^2/a) into the definition of a four-vector:
<br /> \textbf{s}_E=(ct_E-0)\textbf{e}_0+(c^2/a-0)\textbf{e}_1+(0-0)\textbf{e}_2+(0-0)\textbf{e}_3=ct_E\textbf{e}_0+c^2/a\textbf{e}_1<br />

(d)
For this part I'm assuming that I have to draw a straight line of slope 1 or -1, intersecting the wordline of the beacon at an arbitrary time coordinate t_E, such that it also intersects the wordline of the observer. Is this correct?

Any help would be appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alc95 said:
(a) Rearranging the given equations:
\sinh(a\tau/c)=at/c\cosh(a\tau/c)=ax/c^2
Substituting into the relation between sinh and cosh:
(ax/c^2)^2-(at/c)^2=1(a^2x^2-a^2c^2t^2)/c^4=1x^2=c^2t^2+c^4/a^2
This is fine.

(b) when tau=0:
t(0)=0x(0)=c^2/a
this part I'm not so sure of, but here is what I did:
using the equation of motion x_f=x_i+ut+(1/2)at^2x = -½ac^2t^2 + c^2/a
rearranging:
ct=\sqrt{(c^2/a-x)/(a/2)}
First, why do you expect the beacon to accelerate once it's released from the ship, because that's what you're assuming here? Second, what's ##u##? Did you set it to 0? Third, are you sure the Newtonian kinematic equations are valid here? After all, this is a special relativity problem.

I'd start by finding the velocity of the beacon when it's released.

Assuming I have the correct equations (1) and (2), all that remains is to plot them on the same plot of ct vs x?
Yes.

(d)
For this part I'm assuming that I have to draw a straight line of slope 1 or -1, intersecting the wordline of the beacon at an arbitrary time coordinate t_E, such that it also intersects the wordline of the observer. Is this correct?
The slope will be ##\pm 1##, but the line may or may not intersect with the world line of the observer.
 
Thanks for your reply :)

Here is what I have come up with for part (b):
I have already worked out the coordinates for the release of the beacon as (x,ct)=(c^2/a,0). So the worldline of the beacon intersects that of the ship at that point. Now, as you pointed out, the beacon would not necessarily accelerate upon release. So, would it be a straight line that is tangent to the point of release on the ship's wordline? My reasoning for this is that since it is at rest relative to the ship at that instant, their velocities would be equal at that point when plotted on the spacetime diagram.

I'm fairly sure that my part (c) is correct. Could you confirm this?
 
alc95 said:
Here is what I have come up with for part (b):
I have already worked out the coordinates for the release of the beacon as (x,ct)=(c^2/a,0). So the worldline of the beacon intersects that of the ship at that point. Now, as you pointed out, the beacon would not necessarily accelerate upon release. So, would it be a straight line that is tangent to the point of release on the ship's wordline? My reasoning for this is that since it is at rest relative to the ship at that instant, their velocities would be equal at that point when plotted on the spacetime diagram.
Sounds good.

I'm fairly sure that my part (c) is correct. Could you confirm this?
Looks good too.
 
For the spacetime diagram in Q1, I got a wordline for the beacon as a straight vertical line, intersecting that of ship at x=c^2/a. I'm not quite sure about this.

Problem statement
Q1
(e) The pulse is received by the observer at the observer’s proper time R. Show that this
event can be represented, with respect to the origin of S, by the position four vector
<br /> s_R=(c^2/a)(\sinh{(a\tau_R/c)}\textbf{e}_0+\cosh{(a\tau_R/c)}\textbf{e}_1)<br />

(f) The world line of the pulse (consisting of zero-rest mass particles) can then be parameterised
in terms of the affine parameter as
<br /> s(\lambda)=s_E (1-\lambda)+s_R\lambda<br />
Write down the four-velocity u of this pulse.

(g) Using the fact that u is a null vector, show that u0 = u1.

(h) Using the result of part (g), show that the time of reception of the pulse will be given
by:
<br /> \tau_R=-(c/a)\ln{(1-at_E/c)}<br />

Attempt at a solution
Q1
(e)
I had no issues with this part.

(f)
subbing in s_E and s_R and evaluating, assuming my algebra is correct:
<br /> s(\lambda)=(ct_E(1-\lambda)+\lambda(c^2/a)\sinh{(a\tau_R/c)})\textbf{e}_0+((c^2/a)(1-\lambda)+\lambda(c^2/a)\cosh{(a\tau_R/c)}))\textbf{e}_1<br />
then, the four-velocity is, by differentiating:
<br /> \textbf{u}=(\lambda c)(\cosh{(a\tau_R/c)}\textbf{e}_0+\sinh{(a\tau_R/c)}\textbf{e}_1)<br />

(g)
for a null vector the absolute value should be 0:
<br /> \sqrt{(u_0)^2+(u_1)^2}=0<br />
<br /> \pm((u_0)^2+(u_1)^2)=0<br />

(h) I am not sure how to use the result of part (g) when solving for tau_R. Is the idea to substitute this into the four-vector derived in part (f)?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top