Object Weight on Magnetar vs Neutron Star: Attract or Repel?

In summary, the Action Lab guy demonstrates how Osmium - the heaviest metal on the periodic table - can be made to float in a ferro-fluid, which - when minding its own business - is little more dense than water.
  • #1
kuartus4
25
0
TL;DR Summary
A non magnetar, normal neutron star
Probably a misguided question, but would the intense magnetic field of a magnetar increase the overall pull an object would feel at the surface of the magnetar as compared to a regular neutron star? Or would it possibly lessen the amount of gravitational pull the object would feel at the surface, due to it being repelled by the magnetic field?

So I guess this boils down to, does the magnetic field repel or attract the object, and how much in comparison to the stars gravity?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Is the object ferrous?
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and berkeman
  • #3
DaveC426913 said:
Is the object ferrous?
Lets say yes.
 
  • #4
kuartus4 said:
does the magnetic field repel or attract the object, and how much in comparison to the stars gravity?
There are actually two effects here. First is the ordinary EM field effect, which will depend on the nature of the material and its charge, if any.

Second is the fact that the magnetic field itself carries energy, which means it is itself a source of gravity--i.e., it will increase the total stress-energy of the neutron star as compared to a neutron star otherwise identical but with no magnetic field. This will increase the effective "mass" of the neutron star in terms of determining its gravitational pull.
 
  • Like
Likes PAllen
  • #5
PeterDonis said:
There are actually two effects here. First is the ordinary EM field effect, which will depend on the nature of the material and its charge, if any.

Second is the fact that the magnetic field itself carries energy, which means it is itself a source of gravity--i.e., it will increase the total stress-energy of the neutron star as compared to a neutron star otherwise identical but with no magnetic field. This will increase the effective "mass" of the neutron star in terms of determining its gravitational pull.
If I'm interpreting you correctly, a magnetar has higher surface gravity than a non magnetar, all else being equal?

I remember experiments where normally non magnetic objects(like small animals) can be levitated using very powerful magnetic fields. Would a magnetar's magnetic field have a similar anti gravity effect on non magnetic objects near the star(assuming they won't be obliterated by the extreme conditions)?
 
  • #6
kuartus4 said:
If I'm interpreting you correctly, a magnetar has higher surface gravity than a non magnetar, all else being equal?
If you're only considering the gravitational effects of stress-energy, yes.

kuartus4 said:
I remember experiments where normally non magnetic objects(like small animals) can be levitated using very powerful magnetic fields.
This effect has nothing to do with gravity, and is certainly not "antigravity". It's just inducing magnetic fields inside the normally non-magnetic objects that then cause normal magnetic repulsion between the objects and the source of the magnetic field.
 
  • #7
PeterDonis said:
If you're only considering the gravitational effects of stress-energy, yes.This effect has nothing to do with gravity, and is certainly not "antigravity". It's just inducing magnetic fields inside the normally non-magnetic objects that then cause normal magnetic repulsion between the objects and the source of the magnetic field.
Right, thank you. I just meant in the sense that it works against the pull of gravity. Am I on the right track assuming the magnetar would induce a magnetic repulsion on something like a chunk of carbon which would at least partially counteract the amount of gravity it feels? By analogy, in the way buoyancy counteracts the amount of gravity a person feels in water.
 
  • #8
kuartus4 said:
Am I on the right track assuming the magnetar would induce a magnetic repulsion on something like a chunk of carbon which would at least partially counteract the amount of gravity it feels?
I believe the magnetic field of a magnetar would act on a piece of non-magnetic matter similarly to the magnetic fields in the "levitation" experiments you mention, yes. But I have not looked at the properties of magnetars in any detail.
 
  • #9
This might be a good time to look at Earth-bound demos.
Google ActionLabs Ferrofluids Osmium


Action Lab guy demonstrates how Osmium - the heaviest metal on the periodic table - can be made to float in a ferro-fluid, which - when minding its own business - is little more dense than water.
 

1. What is a magnetar and a neutron star?

A magnetar is a type of neutron star that has an extremely strong magnetic field. Neutron stars are the densest objects in the universe, created when a massive star collapses in a supernova explosion.

2. How do the magnetic fields of magnetars and neutron stars compare?

The magnetic fields of magnetars are much stronger than those of regular neutron stars. While the magnetic field of a typical neutron star is around 10^12 Gauss, magnetars can have fields up to 10^15 Gauss.

3. Do objects experience different weights on a magnetar compared to a neutron star?

Yes, the strong magnetic fields of magnetars can affect the weight of objects placed on them. The weight of an object on a magnetar can be significantly different than on a neutron star or on Earth.

4. Do objects on a magnetar attract or repel?

It depends on the orientation of the object's magnetic field. If the object's field is aligned with the magnetar's, it will be attracted. If the object's field is anti-aligned, it will be repelled.

5. Can the weight of an object on a magnetar change over time?

Yes, the weight of an object on a magnetar can change as the magnetar's magnetic field evolves. This is because the strength and orientation of the magnetic field can vary over time.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
19
Views
3K
Back
Top