- #1
tgt
- 522
- 2
Gauss said: "Mathematics is the queen of the sciences and number theory is the queen of mathematics." But would he still make this comment today after learning the new abstraction and foundations that mathematics has taken on?
iopmar06 said:I think that statement is still true regardless of the newer branches of mathematics (even though I don't find number theory particularly interesting).
Besides, Gauss doesn't seem like a man who would take back something he has said.
gel said:why would number theory be classed as the queen of mathematics?
tgt said:What kind of new branches of maths have you learned?
Antuan said:If mathematics is the queen of the sciences, then who would be the king ? Any suggestions ?
qntty said:Possibly http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_logic" ?
Kurret said:imo logic and mathematics are equivalent in this contex, mathematics is just more advanced and more developed logic. Maybe the king of science would be imagination? To be sucessful in science you both need to master logical reasoning, but without fantasy and imagination you will not be able to apply your mathematical skills to discover new science.
Number theory is not synonymous with arithmetic. :grumpy:tgt said:Any science with the minimal amount of quantification would first start with the use of numbers. That is the reason.
Gauss did work in many areas of science.
Kurret said:imo logic and mathematics are equivalent in this contex, mathematics is just more advanced and more developed logic. Maybe the king of science would be imagination? To be sucessful in science you both need to master logical reasoning, but without fantasy and imagination you will not be able to apply your mathematical skills to discover new science.
Hurkyl said:Number theory is not synonymous with arithmetic. :grumpy:
Antuan said:If mathematics is the queen of the sciences, then who would be the king ? Any suggestions ?
Of course you are right; each and every individual whose mind is greatly concerned with Science is a great person. Nevertheles, a favourite great person can be chosen by other individuals for admiration and, i may say, as a mentor. For me, instead of personality, accomplishments of a favourite scientist is important. That way i disagree with mhill, too; but on the other hand he has the right to admire Euler for his personality. That is what i cannot interfere.yasiru89 said:I would make no judgement on these individuals, or indeed, any individual, based solely on what they may have been like in their social interations and attitudes. It is their contributions that hold any sway- and in this regard, the only one that counts, both Euler and Gauss were truly great men.
It is difficult to say for sure, as Gauss passed away in 1855. However, given his strong belief in the importance of mathematics, it is likely that he would still hold this viewpoint.
While the fundamental principles of mathematics have not changed, its applications and impact on various fields have greatly increased. Today, mathematics is used in numerous industries and plays a crucial role in advancing technology and scientific discoveries.
Gauss believed that mathematics is the foundation upon which all other sciences are built. Its ability to provide precise and logical explanations for natural phenomena makes it essential in understanding and advancing other fields of study.
While opinions may vary, many scientists would likely agree with Gauss' statement. Mathematics is often referred to as the "language of science" and its importance and relevance in different disciplines cannot be denied.
Gauss' comment has solidified the importance of mathematics in the scientific community and has helped to elevate its status as a crucial tool for understanding the world around us. It has also inspired mathematicians and scientists to continue pushing the boundaries of mathematics and its applications.