Would this experiment lights the bulb for a moment?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether a lightbulb would emit visible light for a moment when a wire connected to a positive source is briefly touched to it, considering the nature of electric charge and circuit connections. Participants explore concepts related to electrical potential, charge, and black body radiation, while addressing the conditions necessary for the lightbulb to emit light.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the lightbulb emits infrared light at room temperature due to the movement of electrons, while others clarify that visible light requires higher temperatures.
  • There is a discussion about the importance of voltage difference over the type of charge (positive or negative) in determining whether the bulb will light up.
  • One participant questions whether the lightbulb emits infrared light due to the movement of electrons even when not connected to a circuit.
  • Another participant emphasizes that a closed circuit is necessary for the bulb to light, pointing out that connecting to different battery terminals will not work.
  • A later reply discusses the possibility of a pulse of current through the bulb if the charged object has enough charge, suggesting that this could lead to a flash of visible light.
  • Clarifications are requested regarding the definitions of charged objects, voltage difference, and the concept of particles in the context of electricity and thermodynamics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conditions under which the lightbulb would emit visible light, with some emphasizing the need for a closed circuit and others discussing the effects of charge and current. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of how the lightbulb would behave under the proposed experiment.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made about the circuit configuration and the nature of the charge distribution in the wire. The discussion also reflects varying levels of understanding among participants regarding electrical concepts.

sleepsleep
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
hi,
wish to ask, if experiment like below image :
http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/4417/image28ei.png

would the bulb lights for a "moment or X milisecond?" once we touch the wire B to the bulb?

assume the wire B is a long long wire (just wire)
wire A already attached to positive source

thank you in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
well, the lightbulb is always emitting light in room temperature, but it's in the infrared section of the spectrum, if you want the lightbulb to light in visible light you must make it warm enough.

if you'd put a positively charged object with enough charge on it, it would light the bulb...
 
fargoth said:
if you'd put a positively charged object...

you mean positively charged object or negatively charged object?
coz wire A already connected to positive source. :?
 
fargoth said:
the lightbulb is always emitting light in room temperature...
does it means the "electrons" on the lightbulb, although not connected with wire ~ just the bulb alone) . are always "moving" (maybe in low potential difference), so the lightbulb would somehow emits the "infrared section of spectrum" ?
 
it doesn't matter if the object is charged with a positive charge or a negative one - it's the voltage difference that matters here, not the direction... the current which moves through the lightbulb's wire is only used to heat it up, you don't see light from the current electrons.

the radiation a lightbulb is emitting is of the king of "black body radiation"
according to thermodynamics there's a Boltzmann destribution of energy states amon every "particle" of the system, when a "particle" is above it's ground state, it will eventually emmit a photon and get to a lower state.
this distribution is dependent upon temperature - you got more excited particles when the temperature is higher.
in room temperature most of the emitted radiation is infra-red, when you warm it up, to say, 2200 kelvin (about 2500 celsius) you get the usual yellowish light you get from a lightbulb. (and if it's 1000 kelvin it'll be red)
in a metal wire the "particles" that emmit the visible raidation are electrons, and that's why is put "" on that word - an electron is hardly a particle in the classical sense.

that's something a little off-topic, but it's a blacl-body radiation example:
most computer screens comes with two pre-set color schemes, one is 9300K (for brighter white - that's what most people prefer to work with)
and 5500K (sometimes 6500K) for image management - because our sun is emmiting light like a blackbody radiation with around 5500K-6000K temperature (the surface temperature of the sun).

when people talk about hues of white, they usually use the Kelvin scale.
 
Last edited:
thank you for your reply, if possible, could you please clarify the following term. (in plain words) ~ coz i am just a physics beginner.

you mentioned about positive charged object and negative charged object, could you please explain them a little bit.

is voltage difference same as potential difference or electric difference?

you mentioned about "particles", if possible, could you give me a rough idea what it is?

sincerely,
thanks a lot and i learn something new "black body radiation" :)
 
you're welcom :biggrin:

a positvely carged object is an object who's total charge is positive (i.e. more protons then electrons for normal life objects)
and a negatively charged object is an object who's total charge is negative (i.e. more electrons then protons)..

yes, voltage is electric potential difference - and charge will experience force and thus move (when free) when a a potential difference is introduced, when the voltage increases the force the charge feels increases too.

when i said "particles" i ment every material microscopic object in general, they all obey the same basic statistics - which say that there's a probability for every object to be in an excited state, and the probability for higher energy states increases as the temperature increases.

in the case of the bulb, you got electrons and protons as your "particles"
but the electrons in that wire behave more like waves then anything else.

to learn more about black-body radiation in laymen's terms try looking at howstuffworks.com or wikipedia.org
http://science.howstuffworks.com/light-bulb1.htm
is a good start
 
Last edited:
Good work, Fargoth. I just want to backtrack to the original question for a sec. Sleepx2, your diagram does not indicate a closed circuit. Remember that your negative connection has to be to the 'other side' of the positive source. If you hook one wire to the positive terminal of a battery, and the other to the negative terminal of a different battery, nothing will happen. While Fargoth is correct about the bulb radiating IR, it has nothing to do with your electric circuit.
Pardon the intrusion, but I felt that some clarification was in order. :smile:
 
Thanks, Danger.
But in his scheme he drew a charged object, and a long wire, for a split second this long wire can be regarder as ground (and after that split second it will charge-up so that there would be no electric field inside the wire), so there would be a pulse of current through the bulb's wire (it's intensity-time shape depends on the charge amount on the charged object, the resistivity of the long wire, and the length of the wire), until the wire would have a new charge distribution.
div(j) would be non-zero, because charge builds up in the wire, and not just flow through it...

so, yes, the bulb can emmit a flash of visible light if the charged body has enough charge.
i just talked about black body radiation to make it clear that the only part of this pulse of current is heating the bulb's wire up.
(although in this case, because it's a varying current there could be some photons from the current too, but i don't think they're noticable.)
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Ahhh... gotcha. That's all quite a bit over my head, but it references back to the first thing that I learned about blowing things up. You always lay out your detonator cable before you attach it to the primer cap, because moving it can cause a pulse.
 

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
14K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K