X-Ray Emission from Synchrotrons vs. Cyclotrons

  • Thread starter Thread starter oldmisery
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Emission X-ray
AI Thread Summary
Accelerating electrons in synchrotrons emit significant X-rays due to their relativistic Lorentz factor, which increases the emission power dramatically compared to protons in cyclotrons. While protons also emit synchrotron radiation, the power is much lower, making it less significant at equivalent energies. In high-energy environments like the LHC, proton synchrotron radiation can lead to issues such as vacuum pressure rises due to desorption of gas atoms from beam tube walls. This phenomenon can result in proton residual gas scattering and subsequent beam loss. Understanding the differences in radiation emission between electrons and protons is crucial for optimizing particle accelerator performance.
oldmisery
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Why do accelerating electrons (synchrotron) emit x-rays, but accelerating protons (cyclotron) don't? Both are accelerating/decelerating charges.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The emission power of synchrotron radiation depends on the relativistic Lorentz factor γ to the fourth power, so 10 GeV electrons radiate much more than 10 GeV protons, other factors being the same. See

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/particles/synchrotron.html

Protons do radiate synchrotron radiation. It is expected to be a serious problem in LHC at full energy (7 GeV per beam), because the proton synchrotron radiation is soft x-rays, that cause residual gas atoms adsorbed to the beam tube walls to desorb, causing a vacuum pressure rise and proton residual gas scattering and beam loss.

Bob S
 
Thanks to both for the reference, it's a great help.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
54
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
18K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Back
Top