X-Ray Safety Advice for Non-Living Material Experiments: Tips & Techniques

  • Thread starter Thread starter compro21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    X-ray
AI Thread Summary
When experimenting with x-ray imaging of non-living materials, safety is paramount, particularly regarding radiation exposure. It's essential to determine the appropriate thickness of lead or alternative materials for effective x-ray absorption, considering both intensity and energy spectrum. Eye protection is crucial, as x-rays can affect the retina differently than other tissues, necessitating specialized gear. Detecting stray x-rays requires understanding the limitations of devices like Geiger counters, which may only capture a small fraction of emitted rays. Engaging in such experiments should ideally be conducted within a professional setting with established safety protocols to prevent harm.
compro21
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am looking to do some experimentation with x-ray imaging of non-living materials, and need advice on how to do it safely.

My questions fall under two categories: 1) How do I ensure that the radiation does not come in contact with human flesh, and 2) How do I detect the radiation from the x-rays.

My setup: I have a directional x-ray emitter that outputs a low voltage x-ray onto an object which is captured on a screen behind it.

How do I keep people safe: Lead can stop x-rays, but how thick does the lead need to be for a given x-ray intensity? Are there charts relating x-ray wavelength intensity, and wavelength to lead absorption?

Lead poses another problem to human health. Are there other materials available that are dense enough to absorb x-rays, but are not poisonous to humans? I suppose that's one of the cache-22s of heavy metals.

What type of eye protection is needed? Should the eyes be treated any differently than other parts of the body? Do x-rays affect the retina differently than other human tissue?

How do you detect stray x-rays? I know Gieger counters can somewhat detect x-rays, but I hear only 1% of the rays.

I know I can get phosphoric coatings, but is there an easier way than painting a whole room?
 
Science news on Phys.org
compro21 said:
I am looking to do some experimentation with x-ray imaging of non-living materials, and need advice on how to do it safely.

My questions fall under two categories: 1) How do I ensure that the radiation does not come in contact with human flesh, and 2) How do I detect the radiation from the x-rays.

My setup: I have a directional x-ray emitter that outputs a low voltage x-ray onto an object which is captured on a screen behind it.

How do I keep people safe: Lead can stop x-rays, but how thick does the lead need to be for a given x-ray intensity? Are there charts relating x-ray wavelength intensity, and wavelength to lead absorption?

Lead poses another problem to human health. Are there other materials available that are dense enough to absorb x-rays, but are not poisonous to humans? I suppose that's one of the cache-22s of heavy metals.

What type of eye protection is needed? Should the eyes be treated any differently than other parts of the body? Do x-rays affect the retina differently than other human tissue?

How do you detect stray x-rays? I know Gieger counters can somewhat detect x-rays, but I hear only 1% of the rays.

I know I can get phosphoric coatings, but is there an easier way than painting a whole room?

Hello,

to your first question: absorbing or stopping x-rays is not only a question of their intensity, but also of the energy or energy spectrum of the incident rays!
soft x-rays (<20keV) are stopped sufficiently by a 2mm thick tungsten (W), however keep in mind the mechanism of absorption process of x-rays in a material; hard x-rays undergo a multiple process with the atoms, respectively the electrons and will be transferred to low energy x-rays at the output.

To detect x-rays also the energy range is important, as there a several types of detectors for low and high energy x-rays. Moreover you may chose between single counting devices (e.g. Geiger tube) or integrating devices as the CCD (charge coupled device).
Single Photon counting devices for the Soft X-ray region is our (Photron-X) core competence.

BRs,
SAXSIST
 
compro21 said:
I am looking to do some experimentation with x-ray imaging of non-living materials, and need advice on how to do it safely.

My questions fall under two categories: 1) How do I ensure that the radiation does not come in contact with human flesh, and 2) How do I detect the radiation from the x-rays.

My setup: I have a directional x-ray emitter that outputs a low voltage x-ray onto an object which is captured on a screen behind it.

How do I keep people safe: Lead can stop x-rays, but how thick does the lead need to be for a given x-ray intensity? Are there charts relating x-ray wavelength intensity, and wavelength to lead absorption?

Lead poses another problem to human health. Are there other materials available that are dense enough to absorb x-rays, but are not poisonous to humans? I suppose that's one of the cache-22s of heavy metals.

What type of eye protection is needed? Should the eyes be treated any differently than other parts of the body? Do x-rays affect the retina differently than other human tissue?

How do you detect stray x-rays? I know Gieger counters can somewhat detect x-rays, but I hear only 1% of the rays.

I know I can get phosphoric coatings, but is there an easier way than painting a whole room?

First of all, under what circumstances are you doing this "... some experimentation with x-ray imaging... "? Are you doing this as part of your job, or are you simply tinkering on your own in the basement of your house?

If you are doing the former, I will be extremely shocked that the company/institution you are working for does not already have a set of safety protocol for you to follow. If you are doing the latter, STOP!

Zz.
 
I'm with ZapperZ on this. It seems as if you are doing this as a home project of sorts. If so, then PLEASE reconsider. You WILL end up harming yourself or someone else. Radiation, even in small amounts, is not something you should work with unless you have sufficient professional training in the proper safety procedures AND the experience necessary to work on your own.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Back
Top