Yes, your approach and calculations look correct. Good job!

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the heat required to raise the temperature of 0.2 kg of ice from -20°C to 30°C. The solution involves three steps: heating the ice from -20°C to 0°C, melting the ice using latent heat, and then heating the resulting water from 0°C to 30°C. The total heat required is calculated using the equation Q = mcΔt for each phase and results in a total of 99,600 J. Participants confirm the calculations are correct but note the inconsistency in significant figures. Overall, the approach and calculations are validated by multiple contributors.
STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



How much heat is required to heat 0.2kg of ice from -20°C to 30°C?

Homework Equations



Total heat lost or gained : ##Q = mcΔt## where ##Δt## is the change in temperature and c is the heat capacity.

Latent Heat Fusion : ##Q = mL_f##

The Attempt at a Solution



From my understanding, I think I need to break this problem down into states.

The ice will start melting at 0°C ( since ice is just condensed water ). So the ice must be heated from -20°C to 0°C for it to melt.

Then we must use Latent Heat to melt the ice.

Finally we would have to heat the water from 0°C to 30°C.

So the amount of heat we would need can be expressed by the equation :

##Q_T = Q_{Ice} + Q_{Melt} + Q_{Water} = mc_{Ice}Δt_{Ice} + mL_f + mc_{Water}Δt_{Water}##

Then plugging and chugging I get :

##(0.2 kg)(2100 J/kg°C)(0°C + 20°C) + (0.2 kg)(330000 J/kg) + (0.2)(4200 J/kg°C)(30°C - 0°C) = 99600J##

Therefore 99600J of heat would be required to heat the ice from its original state to a heated state of water.

Does this look okay?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good!
 
Yep, looks good to me as well.
 
yep. looks good to me too. Although you have used 2 significant figures in your values, so does it make sense to have 3 significant figures in your answer?

edit: hehe, everyone seems to have posted a reply near-simultaneously.
 
BruceW said:
edit: hehe, everyone seems to have posted a reply near-simultaneously.

You're all so fast lol. Thanks for the confirm guys :).
 
"edit: hehe, everyone seems to have posted a reply near-simultaneously. " It's because it was an easy problem :-)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top