Your friendly physics retard is at it again

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics homework problem involving a spring gun, where a ball is propelled by a spring with a force constant of 400 N/m and a constant friction force of 6 N acting against it. The key point is that the ball does not reach its maximum speed at the end of the barrel due to the opposing friction force, which gradually overcomes the spring's force as the spring decompresses. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the relationship between work done by the spring and the work done against friction to find the position where the ball achieves its greatest speed. Calculations and graphing of the velocity function are discussed, with some participants suggesting a more systematic approach using equations of motion. The conversation highlights the complexities of balancing forces and energy in this scenario.
Brin
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Alright, I'm doing a homework problem and for the love of holy things, I can't seem to find the solution to this problem, though I feel I have a pretty 'solid' physical feel for it (which, I admit, is better then a complete lack of understanding).

Anyways, the 'question' is:
The spring of a spring gun has force constant k = 400 N/m and negligible mass. The spring is compressed 6.00 cm and a ball with mass 0.0300 kg is placed in the horizontal barrel against the compressed spring. The spring is then released, and the ball is propelled out the barrel of the gun. The barrel is 6.00 cm long, so the ball leaves the barrel at the same point that it loses contact with the spring. The gun is held so the barrel is horizontal.

Given that there is a constant 6 N resisting force acting against the ball as it moves along the barrel, at what position along the barrel does the ball have the greatest speed? (In this case, the maximum speed does not occur at the end of the barrel.)

My understanding is that the constant friction force makes it unlikely that the ball is going to be going its fastest at the end of the barrel, and that it is more likely to hit its "top speed" somewhere near the end, but not quite.

My reasoning is this, as the spring approaches its state of equilibrium (not stretched, nor compressed) the force it inflicts on the ball lessens as it moves down the tube. At some point the force of friction overcomes the strength of the spring, and begins slowing it down.

My problem is in "finding" this position.

I reason that the maximum potential energy, at some point, becomes equal to the force of friction at some point, this happens while the spring loses its energy and the friction remains constant.

According to my math (and an initial guess):

Potential Energy of a Spring at position x = Force of Friction acting over distance X
1/2kx^2 =F_f*x

This produced 3/100 or 0.03 when I solve for it. Which is a nice understandable, and seemingly correct answer. Not so, I guess. Which then had me thinking - okay, if not at half, then when? Is it still accelerating at some point? Do I have the wrong idea entirely?!

Thanks for the attention,
-Bryan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the spring is being compressed 6cm which is the distance of the barrel so it doesn't meet equilibrium until its at the end of the barrel

it's been awhile since i took physics so i might be wrong but that's how i see it
 
Very cool problem, haven't seen one asked like this. Anyway there are some basic facts:

Net Work = Change in Kinetic Energy
Net work done by the friction = Force*Distance
Net work done by the spring = .5*k*(x_i^2-x_f^2)

see if you can solve it using this info
 
Think carefully about 'balancing' forces against energies. If I were you I'd think about the connection between force and energy. Then talk about only forces or about only work done (energies). You can work out the speed of the ball (as a function of x) using either (although I'd guess that work done might be neater, faster and easier). Then working out the place where this occurs is just an easy bit of calculus.
Hope that helps!
 
I've reworked this a million times - is anyone getting an answer that is different from 0.03? I'd also like to note that the speed here using 0.03 isn't as great as the final velocity when it leaves the barrel (4.90 m/s, which by the way was the correct answer to a question prior to this regarding the final velocity)

Am I really messing up here?

I went so far as to graph out my velocity function as well:
http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/6376/ughek2.jpg

As you can see the velocity just increases as it moves down the barrel...

Oddly - it begins at 0.3 though...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Firstly, I think from looking at the equation you have on your chart that you need to re-read Bishopuser's post. The work done on the ball by the spring is not 1/2kx^2!
Secondly, do you have an answer? (so I can check I've done this right! I get x=1.5cm)
 
muppet: Your result is correct.

I would say that the 'safest' approach to solve this problem would be to consider the equation of motion for the ball.

1. Set up your coordinate system. The easiest thing is to set the origin to coincide with the equilibrium position of the spring, ie at the end point of the gun.
2. Find out what forces are acting on the ball.
3. Use Newtons law to write out the equations of motion.

You can manipulate the equation a little, so it will be easy to solve, once you do that, you should see that the solution is only 'shifted'. You know where max velocity occurs wthout force, so where would it appear when the 'shift' is applied?
 
your equation is almost correct, but you have to take into account the springs initial compression into your spring work terms.
 
Back
Top