Z-Component of Angular Momentum.

FLms
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle is in a state described by the wave function:

\Psi = \frac{1}{\sqrt{4}}(e^{i\phi} sin \theta + cos \theta) g(r),

where

\int\limits_0^\infty dr r^{2} |g(r)|^{2} = 1

and \phi and \theta are the azimuth and polar angle, respectively.

OBS: The first spherical harmonics are:

Y_{0,0} = \frac{1}{sqrt{4 \pi}, Y_{1,0} = \frac{sqrt{3}}{sqrt{4 \pi} cos \theta and Y_{1,\pm1} = \mp \frac{sqrt{3}}{sqrt{8 \pi}} e^{\pm i \phi} sin \theta

a - What are the possibles results of a measurement of the z-componet L_{z} of the angular momentum of the particle in this state?
b - What is the probability of obtaining each of the possible results of part (a)?
c - What is the expectation value of L_{z}?

Homework Equations




L_{z} = -i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi}

L_{z} \Psi = m_{l} \hbar \Psi


The Attempt at a Solution



I start by writing the wavefunction in terms of the spherical harmonics.

\Psi = (- \frac{\sqrt{2}{\sqrt{3}}} Y_{1,1} + \frac{1}{sqrt{3} Y_{1,0}) g(r)

So, the possibles values for m_{l} are 0 and 1; and l_{z} = 0\hbar and l_{z} = 1 \hbar

Thus, the probabilities should be P = \frac{2}{3} for l_{z} = 1 \hbar and P = 1/3 for l_{z} = 0 \hbar.

For the expectation value, I should evaluate the integral:

<L_{z}> = \int \Psi L_{z} \Psi \,d^{3}r = \int \Psi \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial \phi} \,d^{3}r

<L_{z}> = \frac{2}{3} \int Y_{1,1} (-i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi}) Y_{1,1} \,d^{3}r + \frac{1}{3} \int Y_{1,0} (-i \hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial \phi}) Y_{1,0} \,d^{3}r

The Y_{1,0} does not depend on the azimuth angle, so:

<L_{z}> = \frac{2}{3} \int Y_{1,1} (-i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi}) Y_{1,1} \,d^{3}r

<L_{z}> = \frac{2}{3} \hbar \int_0^\pi sin^{2} \theta \,d\theta \int_0^{2 \pi} e^{2 i \phi} \,d\phi


However, the result of this integral is zero.

Is that right or am I doing something wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FLms said:
For the expectation value, I should evaluate the integral:

<L_{z}> = \int \Psi L_{z} \Psi \,d^{3}r = \int \Psi \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial \phi} \,d^{3}r

Did you forget to take the complex conjugate somewhere?

You can get the answer for ##<L_{z}>## without doing these integrations by just using the probabilities that you have found.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
TSny said:
Did you forget to take the complex conjugate somewhere?

Yes. The integral is actually:\int \Psi^{*} L_{z} \Psi \,d^{3}r = -i \hbar \int \Psi^{*} \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial \phi} \,d^{3}r

And,

Y_{l,m}^{*} = (-1)^{m}Y_{l,-m}

TSny said:
You can get the answer for ##<L_{z}>## without doing these integrations by just using the probabilities that you have found.

&lt;L_{z}&gt; = P_{m_{l} = 1} (m_{l} \hbar) + P_{m_{l} = -1} (m_{l} \hbar)
&lt;L_{z}&gt; = \frac{2}{3}(1 \hbar) + \frac{1}{3} (0 \hbar)
&lt;L_{z}&gt; = \frac{2}{3} \hbar

Is that it?

By solvind the integral, I get &lt;L_{z}&gt; = \frac{2}{3} \pi^{2} \hbar.
 
Last edited:
FLms said:
&lt;L_{z}&gt; = P_{m_{l} = 1} (m_{l} \hbar) + P_{m_{l} = -1} (m_{l} \hbar)
&lt;L_{z}&gt; = \frac{2}{3}(1 \hbar) + \frac{1}{3} (0 \hbar)
&lt;L_{z}&gt; = \frac{2}{3} \hbar

Is that it?
Yes. (Maybe a typographical error in your first line.)

By solvind the integral, I get &lt;L_{z}&gt; = \frac{2}{3} \pi^{2} \hbar.

It seems to come out ok for me. I don't think your original wave function ##\Psi## is normalized.
(Your integrals over the spherical harmonics should not have ##d^3r## since you have presumably already integrated over ##r##.)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top