Zeeman Effect for a Muon: Differences Compared to Ordinary Hydrogen Atoms

pka
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider an atom composed of a proton nucleus and an orbiting negatively charged muon (which has a mass of 207*(mass of an electron)). What difference, if any, would you expect between the Zeeman Effect in such atoms and in ordinary hydrogen atoms? (Hint: the muon has spin -1/2, but a greater mass than the electron).


What I've done:
The change in energy for a hydrogen atom according to the Zeeman effect (or because of it) is: delta E = 2*(bohr magneton, Mb)*(magnetic field).

This is where I am getting a little confused...For the muon, the energy difference will not be the same. What I'm having trouble with is the equation for which to use in order to determine the energy difference for the muon. What I've come up with is this:

Energy difference = 2*[ (e*h-bar)/ (2*207*mass of an electron) ]*(magnetic field)
Is this correct? What makes me unsure is the fact that the muon now has spin (not just a greater mass) so shouldn't my energy difference also be multiplied by the spin of the muon?

Assuming that both the hydrogen atom and the muon are in a uniform magnetic field of 1 Tesla and Mb = [(e*h-bar)/ (2*mass of an electron)] = 9.274 x 10^-24 J/T.

My conclusion is that the energy difference for the muon will be smaller than that for the hydrogen atom because splitting is greater for the atom with spin. Also, the muon has greater mass so the energy difference will end up being closer to zero than the hydrogen atom and thus being smaller and leading to a greater splits in the spectra when you look at the little lines for the muon. On the other hand, the hydrogen atom will simply have three splits on its spectra.

Any help or advice anyone can offer would be fantastic! If I'm thinking about this as I shouldn't be I'd greatly appreciate it with anyone could point me in the right direction. Many thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pka said:

Homework Statement


Consider an atom composed of a proton nucleus and an orbiting negatively charged muon (which has a mass of 207*(mass of an electron)). What difference, if any, would you expect between the Zeeman Effect in such atoms and in ordinary hydrogen atoms? (Hint: the muon has spin -1/2, but a greater mass than the electron).


What I've done:
The change in energy for a hydrogen atom according to the Zeeman effect (or because of it) is: delta E = 2*(bohr magneton, Mb)*(magnetic field).

This is where I am getting a little confused...For the muon, the energy difference will not be the same. What I'm having trouble with is the equation for which to use in order to determine the energy difference for the muon. What I've come up with is this:

Energy difference = 2*[ (e*h-bar)/ (2*207*mass of an electron) ]*(magnetic field)
Is this correct? What makes me unsure is the fact that the muon now has spin (not just a greater mass) so shouldn't my energy difference also be multiplied by the spin of the muon?
No, you don't have to worry about the spin. The muon has the same spin as an electron.
 
Alrighty then! Sounds good to me. So I've got the right idea about the rest of the problem? Thanks so much. :D Fantastic!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top