How Does Zeno's Paradox Challenge Our Understanding of Movement and Space?

In summary, Zeno's paradox arises when two different parameter sets, Rational and Empirical, are applied to the same event. In the Rational set, points have no dimensions and an infinite number of points exist between points A and B. In the Empirical set, points are 3-dimensional and there are a finite number of points between A and B. This leads to different outcomes for Zeno's movement between points A and B. It is important to differentiate between these sets, especially in the context of scientific theories, where Rational sets may lack Empirical support. Zeno's paradox is not resolved by assuming discrete movements of atoms, but rather by recognizing the flawed assumption of infinite mathematical points in the Real World.
  • #1
sd01g
271
0
Zeno's paradox (the inability to move between points A and B) results when two incongruous parameter sets are applied to the same event.

In the Rational parameter set, points have no dimensions-only positions. There are an infinite number of points between A and B. The points A and B are assumed not to move, and the halfway point is presumed to be known and to be exactly halfway between A and B.

In the Empirical parameter set, however, all points are 3-dimensional. Points A and B (which are composed of atoms) are moving. There are a finite number of points between A and B and the halfway point is only approximately known because all real measurements are approximate.

Applying the Rational parameter set, Zeno will eternally move exactly halfway between an infinite number of zero-dimension points, never reaching point B.

Applying the Empirical parameter set, Zeno will easily transition between points A and point B.

The reason it important to differentiate between Rational and Empirical parameter sets is due to the increasing use of Rational parameter sets to define such things as hyperspace, M-Theory, and parallel universes. These conjectures often masquerading as theories have no viable Empirical parameter sets to determine their validity. No Rational parameter set conjecture should be allowed the title of theory unless it is accompanied by a legitimate Empirical parameter set.

Of course, this is just an opinion. Any thoughtful critique would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Ignoring science or mathematics...

If Archimedes runs because the points he occupies are moving, then how could I be able to identify the points he used to occupy? You make it sound as if motion is possible because the points one occupies move around, rather than by moving from one point to another.
 
  • #3
sd01g said:
In the Rational parameter set, points have no dimensions-only positions. There are an infinite number of points between A and B. The points A and B are assumed not to move, and the halfway point is presumed to be known and to be exactly halfway between A and B.

In the Empirical parameter set, however, all points are 3-dimensional. Points A and B (which are composed of atoms) are moving. There are a finite number of points between A and BA and the halfway point is only approximately known because all real measurements are approximate.
This is not how Zeno's paradox is resolved, though it is a popularly erroneous way of resolving it; you have made the fundamental error in your empirical set by assuming that objects move "one atom at a time" in discrete time- and space-steps. If this is true, how do atoms move through vacuum ?
 
  • #4
Key points

The key points in Zeno's paradox are points A and B. In the Rational parameter set, these points have only one attribute- absolute fixed position. In the Empirical parameter set there is no such thing as an absolute fixed position. Also, it is my understanding that 'approaching 1 as a limit' is not exactly the same thing as exactly equalling 1. IF approaching 1 as a limit exactly equals 1, then my parameter set analysis is defective and will be withdrawn. Thanks for your help. (It really is not so bad being wrong when one is attempting to understand difficult and complex ideas, if one can learn from one's mistakes.)
 
  • #5
Wrong parameter set

hypermorphism said:
This is not how Zeno's paradox is resolved, though it is a popularly erroneous way of resolving it; you have made the fundamental error in your empirical set by assuming that objects move "one atom at a time" in discrete time- and space-steps. If this is true, how do atoms move through vacuum ?

The Empirical Parameter Set does not assume that Objects move 'one atom at a time in discrete time- and space steps.' It is the Rational parameter set that assumes this by requiring Objects to move ' half the distance at a time.'

Zeno's paradox is not paradoxical because we move--this is a given--but because a rational, THOUGHT construct seems to say that one can not move. Zeno assumes there are an infinite number of mathematical or geometrical points (points with no spatial dimensions) between any TWO given points. In the Rational Parameter Set this is true. However, in the Real World--the Empirical Parameter Set--this is absolutely false. Points with no spatial dimentions do not exist in the Real World. A 'zero spatial dimensional point' has never been observed and never will be. Zeno's assumption is empirically wrong.

There really is no paradox, only a faulty assumption.
 
Last edited:

Related to How Does Zeno's Paradox Challenge Our Understanding of Movement and Space?

1. What are Zeno's parameter sets?

Zeno's parameter sets refer to a mathematical concept developed by the Greek philosopher Zeno of Elea. It involves the division of a line into infinite parts, and is used to explain the paradox of motion.

2. How are Zeno's parameter sets used?

Zeno's parameter sets are used in mathematical and philosophical discussions about the concept of infinity and the paradoxes of motion. They are also used in calculus and other areas of mathematics to help understand and solve problems involving infinite series.

3. What is the paradox of motion?

The paradox of motion is the philosophical problem of how an object can move from one point to another, since for an object to reach a new point, it must first travel halfway, then halfway again, and so on infinitely. Zeno's parameter sets were developed to help explain this paradox.

4. How do Zeno's parameter sets relate to calculus?

Zeno's parameter sets are a precursor to the concept of limits in calculus. They help to understand the idea of approaching infinity, which is a fundamental concept in calculus.

5. Are Zeno's parameter sets still relevant today?

Yes, Zeno's parameter sets are still relevant today in mathematical and philosophical discussions about infinity and the paradoxes of motion. They are also used in calculus and other areas of mathematics to solve problems involving infinite series and limits.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
3
Replies
86
Views
9K
  • General Math
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top