Zero Amplitude Damped Simple Harmonic Motion with k=0.7s^-1 and f=3Hz

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the concept of zero amplitude in damped simple harmonic motion, specifically with parameters k=0.7 s^-1 and f=3 Hz. Participants clarify that the amplitude, represented by e^-kt, never actually reaches zero, which can lead to confusion regarding the question posed. The focus shifts to determining the times t=0 and t=1 when the displacement x(t) equals zero, rather than the amplitude itself. This distinction is crucial for accurately addressing the problem. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in interpreting the question about displacement in the context of damped motion.
Timburton91
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Damped Simple Harmonic Motion
Relevant Equations
x(t)=e^-kt cos(2πft)
Hi guys sorry if this is the wrong thread,
I have a damped simple harmonic motion pictured below, i have to find the inerval t=0 and t=1 for which the amplitude of x(t) is considered to be zero.

The behaviour of the graph below can be described as e^-kt cos(2πft)

k=0.7s^-1 and f= 3Hz
IMG_20200315_180120147.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't really understand the question, what makes more sense to me is to compute the values ##t_0## and ##t_1## that are the two smallest positive solutions to the equation $$x(t)=0$$ is this your question?
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
Not really man, as, i guessed that would be zero.
Gaussian97 said:
I don't really understand the question, what makes more sense to me is to compute the values ##t_0## and ##t_1## that are the two smallest positive solutions to the equation $$x(t)=0$$ is this your question?
 
Timburton91 said:
Not really man, as, i guessed that would be zero.
What do you think the question is asking?
 
Timburton91 said:
Not really man, as, i guessed that would be zero.
Then, could you please explain to me what is exactly the question? I'm sorry, but I don't understand the question you post in #1.
 
The use of "amplitude " in the question may be misleading. In terms of the expression ##e^{-kt}\cos(2\pi ft)##, the amplitude is ##e^{-kt}##. This is never actually zero. I suggest the intended question is to find when the displacement x(t) is zero.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top