Zero-Point Energy: Calculating the Minimum Value

'AQF
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
"Consider a particle with mass m moving in a potential U=1/2kx^2, as in a mass-spring system. The total energy of the particle is E=p^2/(2m)+1/2kx^2. Assume that p and x are approximately related by the Heisenburg Uncertainty Principal, px approximately equals h.
a) Calculate the minimum possible value of the energy E, and the value of x that gives this this minimum E. This lowest possible energy, which is not zero, is called the zero-point energy.
b) For the x calculated in part (a), what is the ratio of kinetic to potential energy of the particle?" -University Physics, by Young and Freedman pg. 1517

I do not know how to answer this question.
For (a), I assume that you need to take the derivative of E=p^2/(2m)+1/2kx^2 to minimize it, but in respect to what variable?
For (b), since E=U+KE, the ratio must be (E-1/2kx^2)/(1/2kx^2), but I am unsure of what that would be without part (a).

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem tells you to assume that p and x are approximately related in a certain specific way by the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. Try solving this relation for p in terms in x and plugging into the Hamiltonian. Can you find a minimum of the resulting expression?

This is a standard way to estimate the ground state energy of a bound system.
 
What is the "Hamiltonian" that you refer to?
Thanks for your help.
 
Sorry, the Hamiltonian is just the energy.
 
Last edited:
What energy (E, KE, or U)?
 
Come on now, AQF, work with me here. I can't just tell you answer. What energy are you trying to minimize?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top