Zwiebach question with link to text

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Link Text
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


http://books.google.com/books?id=Xm...nDQ&sig=Eqnkxjj7B9gc4-nig1fgUkk7AqQ#PPA172,M1
I am very confused about equation 10.33.

This equation is not derived it is just given, correct?

What does normalization mean in this context?

By the "volume of space" factor V, does he really mean a Jacobian?

Also for Quick Calculation 10.3, how can E_p possibly get in the numerator when it is in the denominator of phi_p?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
ehrenfest said:
This equation (10.33) is not derived it is just given, correct?
Yes.

ehrenfest said:
What does normalization mean in this context?
It means that the norm (also called the length) of \phi_p is 1.

ehrenfest said:
By the "volume of space" factor V, does he really mean a Jacobian?
No, it is just a numerical factor that is meant to cancel out somewhere down the line when a volume integral is performed. In fact, he points this out in the text just below equation (10.36) on page 173.

ehrenfest said:
Also for Quick Calculation 10.3, how can E_p possibly get in the numerator when it is in the denominator of phi_p?
This is straightforward, so I don't want to spoil your fun in figuring it out. Besides in the homework forum, I'm really only allowed to guide you, not tell you. So do as the author says and plug (10.33) into (10.7) [Note: actually, you had better plug it into (10.35) because even though they are meant to be the same, (10.7) has a typo in it or does in my copy of the book]. You will need to apply equation (2.65) page 24, to get the E factor correct.
 
ehrenfest said:

Homework Statement


http://books.google.com/books?id=Xm...nDQ&sig=Eqnkxjj7B9gc4-nig1fgUkk7AqQ#PPA172,M1
I am very confused about equation 10.33.

This equation is not derived it is just given, correct?

Actually, this is simply the most general solution to the equation of motion for phi (eq 10.14). As he wrot, a plane wave solution is of the form 10.16 so a general solution is a linear combination as in 10.33. At this point, there is nothing about qft of particle physics stuff...it's just solving a diff eq. The V factor is convenient if one works in a "box" with peridoic boundary conditions. It's put there to cancel later on in the calculation.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top