Mechanics (Greek: μηχανική) is the area of physics concerned with the motions of physical objects, more specifically the relationships among force, matter, and motion. Forces applied to objects result in displacements, or changes of an object's position relative to its environment.
This branch of physics has its origins in Ancient Greece with the writings of Aristotle and Archimedes (see History of classical mechanics and Timeline of classical mechanics). During the early modern period, scientists such as Galileo, Kepler, and Newton laid the foundation for what is now known as classical mechanics.
It is a branch of classical physics that deals with particles that are either at rest or are moving with velocities significantly less than the speed of light.
It can also be defined as a branch of science which deals with the motion of and forces on bodies not in the quantum realm. The field is today less widely understood in terms of quantum theory.
Moderator's note: Spin-off from previous thread due to topic change.
Because it doesn't work. Bohmian time evolution doesn't involve the coarse graining steps that are used in his calculation. A delta distribution remains a delta distribution at all times and does not decay into ##|\Psi|^2##.
Let ##|l,m\rangle## be a simultaneous eigenstate of operators ##L^2## and ##L_z## and we want to calculate ##\langle l,m|cos(\theta)|l,m'\rangle## where ##\theta## is the angle ##[0,\pi]##. It is true that in general ##\langle l,m|cos(\theta)|l,m'\rangle=0## ##(1)## for the same ##l## even if...
At the time of release, the equation of motion of blocks A and B T-m_ag = m_aa and T=m_b\omega^2R respectively, where T is the tension in the string. Solving for the acceleration a then gives a=\frac{m_b\omega^2R - m_ag}{m_a}. Not sure what I did wrong or what incorrect assumptions I made...
Since we are dealing with an ideal rope, we have that ##T_1=T_2=T_3=F and T_2+T_3=2F=(m+m_p)g\Leftrightarrow F=\frac{m+m_p}{2}g.##
##T_4=3F+(m+m_p+M_p)g=\frac{3}{2}(m+m_p)g+(m+m_p+M_p)g=(\frac{5}{2}m+\frac{5}{2}m_p+M_p)g## and ##T_5=mg-2F.##
Is this correct? If not, I woould appreciate a brief...
Summary:: Torsional stress on freely spinning shaft?
Hey guys,
I’m having some confusion with a certain section of the “Torsion” chapter in my mechanics of materials book: “power transmission”.
Please see the problem below. This is very easy to SOLVE (basically plug and chug with the...
I have a question understanding the reasoning in the book.
The book says in one dimension F=-dU/dr(p.185). From this, the system is stable at distance a when U'(a)=0 and U''(a)>0 where U is differentiated with respect to r.(p.217)
My question arises from the instance of a pendulum where a...
Hello!
I am new to mechanics of materials and I am very confused about the problem below. So the shear formula is:
tau = VQ/It
From the book (Hibbeler) I understand that Q is "y'A', where A' is the cross-sectional area of the segment that is connected to the beam at the juncture where the...
We know that both momentum and position can not be known precisely simultaneously. The more precisely momentum is known means position is more uncertain. In fact, as I understand quantum mechanics, position probability never extends to 0% anywhere in the universe (except at infinity) for any...
Hi I'm reading classical mechanics by Taylor and there is a section about Kepler orbits that i find very interesting so i'd like to see more of classical mechanics with space applications. I appreciate rigouros mathematical books, thanks
Hi, was wondering if anyone is familiar with Symon Mechanics 2nd and 3rd edition. Is there a significant difference between these editions? Ie., content, quality of printing, major corrections?
In non relativistic quantum mechanics, the expectation value of an operator ##\hat{O}## in state ##\psi## is defined as $$<\psi |\hat{O}|\psi>=\int\psi^* \hat{O} \psi dx$$.
Since the scalar product in relativistic quantum has been altered into $$|\psi|^2=i\int\left(\psi^*\frac{\partial...
1) Considering the forces on one of the moons, I have: ##\frac{GMm}{(10R)^2}+\frac{Gm^2}{(20R)^2}=m\frac{v^2}{10R}\Leftrightarrow v=\sqrt{\frac{G}{10R}(M+\frac{m}{4})}.##
2) Considering the initial situation in which the satellite is at rest on the surface of the planet...
1) Since the rod is uniform, with mass m and length l, it has a linear mass density of ##\lambda=\frac{m}{l}##, so ##I_{rod_O}=\int_{x=r}^{x=r+l}x^2 \lambda dx=\frac{\lambda}{3}[(r+l)^3-r^3]=\frac{\lambda r^3}{3}[(1+\frac{l}{r})^3-1]=\frac{1}{3}mr^2[3+\frac{3l}{r}+\frac{l^2}{r^2}].##...
I heard something today about the "informational interpretation" of quantum mechanics and a phrase used was "it from bit." Is there actually such a thing? What does it mean, and how is it distinguished from other interpretations like MWI or Copenhagen?
* The general formula for the magnetic moment of a charge configuration is defined as ##\vec{\mu} = \frac{1}{2} \int \vec{r} \times \vec{J} \,d^3r##* For an electron it's said that the correct equation relating it's spin and magnetic moment is is
##\vec{\mu} =g\frac{q}{2m}\vec{S}##
* It's...
When I read about the launch location, it is explained that the French Guiana launch site was chosen because it is close to the equator, which means it started with a larger tangential speed than if it were launched from a US location. However, doing the numbers, I find that an initial...
Lagrangian mechanics is built upon calculus of variation. This means that we want to find out function which is a stationary point of particular function (functional) which in Lagrangian mechanics is called the action.
To know what this function is, action needs to be defined first. Action is...
In his solution, Morin solves the problem as the hint suggests: cutting the chain into small pieces, taking the component of the external forces along the curve (which is just the component of gravity here) and summing up an in integral, obtaining 0. He then claims that because the "total...
Lets take the original position of the man to be our origin
The plank is uniform so we can assume its mass to be concentrated at its center i.e. 4m from the origin
Xcom= m1x1+m2x2/m1+m2
=50(0) +150(4) /50+150
=3m
There is no external force on the system so the centre of mass does not move...
Hi Fellas! My first post after a long hiatus from forums. Feeling nostalgia (this is the place where it all began, my fuel for quantum fascination so to speak).
I am revisiting the mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics with the dimensional (MLT) perspective. I want to understand what...
Suppose we've an isolated box having ##N## classical distinguishable particles in it, the box being hypothetically divided into two parts, left and right with both parts identical.
Its said that the probability of having the configuration of ##n## particles in the left side is given as...
The hypothesis is that the force of a real spring can be described as $$F = -kx + \alpha x^2$$ with x being the spring deformation and k its constant. The \alpha x^2 would be the force lost by the spring as x becomes too big. To test that, a system was build with block of mass m suspended by a...
Summary:: I am in the highest level Quantum class at my university- technically considered a grad class. I am an undergrad and need advice on just how to learn it. What study tips? Good Youtubers? Physical simulations? Anything that helped you in quantum mechanics.
Hello! I am an undergrad...
Find the question below;
For part (a), i used the graph to find ##t=22##
For part (b), i considered the points;
##(8,20)##, ##(13.333,20)## and ##(0,0)##
it follows that,
Area=##\sqrt {25.454(25.454-21.54)(25.454-24.036)(25.454-5.333)}##
##\sqrt {2842.58}##=##53.31##
There may...
Wawawawawawa! This was a tough one...:biggrin:
Find the question below;
Find my approach below:
We have the following equations;
1. ##v=30-0.5t##
2. ##v=30-1.5t##
Now the car changes its acceleration at some point i.e from ##-\frac{1}{2}## ##m/s^2## to ##-\frac{3}{2}## ##m/s^2## ...
I...
According to the uncertainty principle, when we measure a micro-object with a measuring device, we cannot predict what value the device will show. But if we knew exactly the wave function of this device, together with the wave function of the micro-object, could we exactly predict the result of...
Find the problem and the solution below;
Find my approach to the problem.
Considering the motion of the car;
##v=u+at##
##33.333= 26.6667+30a##
##a=0.2222##
Therefore it follows that,
##s##=## ut##+##\frac {1}{2}####at^2##
##s##=##(26.67 ×30 +(0.5×0.222×30^2)##
##s=900##metres
The distance...
Hi!
I want to self study some of quantum mechanics so i need introductory textbook. I've taken courses on linear algebra that covers all "Linear algebra done right" by Sheldon Axler, multivariable calculus, two courses on general physics and the basics of differentials equations.
I really like...
Now this is a textbook example with solution.
I understand working to solution...my only reservation is on how they used acceleration. The cyclist, i understand was traveling at a constant acceleration of ##2## ##m/s^2## before reaching the top part of the slope.
Now, if he is descending...
This is a textbook problem (Mechanics).
Attached find the question and respective solution.
This is fine with me, i like trying different ways of solving math related problems. My approach is as shown below.
Using the graph sketch
It follows that,
##s##= ##(35×12)##+##\frac...
They say that a rotating knife thrown is more dangerous than a knife thrown straight
I find it weird
If the knife is rotating, it will experience more air drag than if thrown straight which will also depend on plane of rotation(For some reason, I don't know, it experiences more drag if...
I think I undeerstand Lagrangian mechanics but I have a question that will help to clarify some concepts.
Imagine I throw a pencil. For that I have 5 generalised coordinates (x,y,z and 2 rotational).
When I express Kinetic Energy (T) as:
$$T = 1/2m\dot{x^{2}}+1/2m\dot{y^{2}}+1/2m\dot{z^{2}} +...
[Mentor Note -- Three threads on the same problem have been merged into this one]
Hi, I'm doing a lab report on the relationship between the period of oscillations in an unequal length bifilar pendulum. The set up is like below
Can anyone help me derive a formula for the period of oscillations...
Can you please suggest a good introductory statistical and quantum mechanics book which can be self studied.
My math background :
I've done multivariate calculus, vector calculus, linear algebra ,some complex analysis all at the usual undergraduate level.
The books I've self studied thus far...
This is a surface level question and I don't want to go into detail.
Imagine an algorithm which when used with a sensor output gives the statistical moments of a variable in nature (for example mean and standard deviation of a variable). The sensor measures this once in a while (like once in a...
Assume that three boats, ##B_1##, ##B_2## and ##B_3## travel on a lake with a constant magnitude velocity equal to ##v##. ##B_1## always travels towards ##B_2##, which in turn travels towards ##B_3## which ultimately travels towards ##B_1##. Initially, the boats are at points on the water...
This was the question
(The line below is probably some translation of upper line in different language)
For disc it was ma^2/2
For ring it was ma^2
For square lamina it was 2ma^2/3
For rods
It was different
Please explain
Thank You🙏
Where exactly have I gone wrong? I think it is the part where I assume that the person gains the deceleration of the car, but I have no other way to proceed in this case. Also please only use the equations that I have posted below, and it would help if you would not use the equation for...
Imagine this: You have a drum with a radius of 12cm, around that drum is a toothed belt which is connected to a motor. The drum weighs 10kg
The motor should be placed under the drum
How would I calculate the amount of torque needed to rotate the drum
I don't have any idea how to calculate this...
For part 1, I got ## tan \alpha = 1/30 ##
##\alpha = 1.9^{\circ}##
##mgcos(1.9) = 10774N##
I'm a little thrown off by the second part. Are we supposed to assume that in the absence of friction, F = N and then substitute F = ma to solve for this?
I recently started studying some quantum mechanics, so far I have been using online resources(like MIT OCW 8.04/8.05, and Tongs notes I think I have reached a stage where I understand the Schrodinger eqn and can solve it for various potentials(including for the H-atom) but I don't know anything...
I have sometimes seen the claim that one advantage of Lagrangian mechanics is that it works in any frame of reference, instead of like Newtonian mechanics which will hold only in the inertial frame of reference. However isn't this gain only at the sacrifice that the Lagrangian will need to take...