Light scattering (rayleigh scattering)

  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghed87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Scattering
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the wavelength of infrared (IR) light that scatters at only 2.00% of the intensity of visible light at 520nm. The intensity of scattered light is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the wavelength, leading to the equation I(520)/I(IR)=(Lamda/520nm)^4=200. The initial attempt yielded a wavelength of approximately 1960nm, which was questioned due to a misunderstanding regarding the percentage calculation. Clarification revealed that 2% corresponds to a ratio of 1/50, not 200, as the ratio should be based on the percentage of intensity. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly interpreting percentages in calculations.
spaghed87
Messages
24
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


For what wavelength of light is the scattering only 2.00% that of light with a visible wavelength of 520nm?

NOTE: The intensity of scattered light is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the wavelength.


Homework Equations


I(light)/I(IR)=(wavelength of IR / wavelength of light)^4=200


The Attempt at a Solution


I(520)/I(IR)=(Lamda/520nm)^4=200

Where, Lamda is equal to the wavelength of the IR light.

Lamda is ~1960nm (this answer seems to be wrong, why? Do you see an error anywhere? This is going to be how you solve it so the error shouldn't be that big or that a different equation is needed. I know I'm on the right track.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An elementary mistake: 2% has nothing to do with 200.
 
well, according to this solution.

http://www.mscd.edu/~physics/denn/solutions/Ch23/EOC_Solution_23_25.pdf

They used 100 for 1%?

This is the same problem except they are working with a scattering of 1.00% and a wavelength of 500nm.

100 is what the ratio of the intensities is equal to. However, I cannot see where the number 100 is coming from in the solution to the similair problem. They did not specify in the solution. Does the number 100 relate to 1% at all?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, as in 1%=1/100.
 
Thanks, I see now. I've passed differential equations even... I have always got stumped on simple mathmatical things like percentages though. For some reason my brain was thinking just to double the value of 100 for 2%. I do stupid stuff like that all the time. =(
 
You're welcome :-)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top