How Do Phase and Group Velocities Behave in Relativistic Electron Waves?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the dispersion relation for free relativistic electron waves, expressed as ω(k) = √(c²k² + (m_ec²/ħ)²). Participants explore how to derive the phase velocity (v_p = ω/k) and group velocity by differentiating the dispersion relation with respect to k. There is uncertainty regarding the calculation of phase velocity and the treatment of momentum, particularly in relation to de Broglie waves. A key point raised is the implication of the phase velocity exceeding the speed of light, leading to questions about the behavior of group velocity in such scenarios. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical relationships and physical implications of these velocities in the context of relativistic electron waves.
Mindscrape
Messages
1,854
Reaction score
1
The dispersion relation for the free relativisitic electron wave is \omega (k) = \sqrt{c^2 k^2 + (m_e c^2/ \hbar)^2}. Obtain expressions for the phase velocity and group velocity of these waves and show that their product is a constant, independent of k. From your result, what can you conclude about the group velocity if the phase velocity is greater than the speed of light?

The group velocity will be easy to find because I can just differentiate with respect to k. I am not really sure what to do for the phase velocity. I figure that since v_p = f \lambda = E/p then I could use the relativistic energy expression E = (p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4)^{\frac{1}{2}}. I am unsure about how to tackle the momentum. Does an electron have a de Broglie wave dispersion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Showing the product to be constant was just done in another thread, but you can do it on your own. Phase velocity is ω/k.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top