Understanding Strain Invariants in Strength of Materials

AI Thread Summary
Strain invariants are crucial in understanding material behavior, as they remain consistent regardless of the orientation of the coordinate axes. The six components of stress and strain vary with axis direction, making raw numbers less useful for interpretation. There are three key invariants: the first is the sum of direct stresses or strains, representing fluid pressure or uniform deformation; the second, akin to the Von Mises stress, measures average shear at a point, which is vital for assessing ductile failure. The third invariant is mathematically defined but less intuitively understood. Understanding these invariants is essential for accurately describing isotropic material behavior.
CPP
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help me understand the concept of a "strain invariant" given a strain state matrix? or perhaps point me towards something?

thanks for any help.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
This is what the "big idea" of stress and strain invariants is about. The details of the maths is fairly easy to find with Google.

If you have a structure, the way it behaves (the stresses, deflections, failure mode, etc) doesn't depend on where you choose to put the X Y Z axes when you set up model and solve the equations.

But the numbers representing the 6 components of stress and strain at a point (3 direct and 3 shear) DO depend on what direction the axes point in. So, those raw numbers are not always the right things to use, to understand what the solution means.

It turns out there are some functions of the 6 stress/strain components which are independent of the orientation of the axes. There are three of these functions which are called the stress/strain invariants.

If you have an isotropic material, then the physics of the material behaviour is also independent of the orientation of the axes used to describe it. Therefore, the material behaviour (elasticity, plasticity, etc) can be described using the 3 invarants. In fact you must be able to write these formulas using only the invariants, otherwise the material behaviour would not be isotropic.

The first invariant (in the standard numbering convention) is the sum of the direct stresses or strains e_xx + e_yy + e+zz. Physically, that represents the "fluid presssure component" part of a the stress at the point, or the "uniform expansion or compression" part of the strain.

The second invariant is more complicated mathematically, but for stress it's very similar to the Von Mises stress function. It's a measure of the "average amount of shear" at the point. This is why Von Mises stress is a good failure measure for ductile materials which fail because of shear stress not direct stress. The actual formula for VM stress doesn't look much like a "shear stress" at first sight, but if you think about a shear stress, then rotate the axes 45 degrees so the shear is equivalent to tensile and compressive direct stresses, the connection between the VM "difference of principal stresses, squared" formula appears.

The third invariant isn't so simple to understand physically, but the maths says there are three of them, so it is what it is.

Hope that helps get started.
 
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
Back
Top