Newton's Law of Motion for a Straight Line Motion

AI Thread Summary
An oil tanker is being pushed toward a reef at 1.5 m/s when its engines fail, and it can only accelerate backward with a force of 8.0 x 10^4 N. After recalculating the acceleration, it was determined to be 2.22222 x 10^-3 m/s², leading to a time of 675 seconds to travel the 500 m to the reef. The distance traveled during this time was calculated to be 506 m, confirming the ship will hit the reef. The final speed upon impact was found to be 1.5 m/s, which is below the critical threshold of 0.2 m/s, indicating the oil will be safe.
!!!
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An oil tanker's engines have broken down, and the wind is blowing the tanker straight toward a reef at a constant speed of 1.5 m/s. When the tanker is 500 m from the reef, the wind dies down just as the engineer gets the engines going again. The rudder is stuck, so the only choice is to try to accelerate straight backward away from the reef. The mass of the tanker and cargo is 3.6 x 107 kg, and the engines produce a net horizontal force of 8.0 x 104N on the tanker. Will the ship hit the reef? If it does, will the oil be safe? The hull can withstand an impact at a speed of 0.2 m/s or less. You can ignore the retarding force of the water on the tanker's hull.


Homework Equations


F = ma
vx = v0x + axt
x = x0 + v0xt + 1/2 axt2
vx2= v0x2 + 2ax(x-x0)
x - x0 = (v0x + vx / 2)t

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't exactly know what to do first, so I first found the acceleration of the ship's engines.
a = f/m = 8.0 x 104N / 3.6 x 107 kg = 2.22 x 103 m/s2

Then I tried to find the time it takes for the ship to hit the reef:
vx = v0x + axt
1.5 = 0 + (2.22 x 103)(t)
t = 6.757 x 10-4 s.

And plugged it into the distance traveled:
x = x0 + v0xt + 1/2 axt2
x = 0 + 0 + 1/2 (2.22 x 103)(6.757 x 10-4)2
x = 5.02 x 10-4 m.

The book's answer said that it's 506 m so the ship will hit the reef, and the speed at which the ship hits the reef is 0.17 m/s, so the oil should be safe.
But I don't know how to get to the correct answers. :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't you think that a distance of 10^{-4} meter and a time of 10^{-4} seconds is a bit unrealistic? :)

In fact I don't think even dividing 10^4 by 10^7 will give you something of order 10^3, so you better check your acceleration. Probably if you fix that error and follow it through your calculation, you will find the correct answer (i.e. if your acceleration is off by a factor 10^6 your distance will be off by the same factor, leading to an answer of order 5.02 10^2 instead). Since your answer will be so close to the critical distance (e.g. it will barely make it or not) be especially careful about rounding: wrong rounding may produce 499.8 meter while it should actually be 500.4 for example, leading to the wrong conclusion.
 
Okay, so I calculated the ship's engine's acceleration again:
a = f/m = 8.0 x 104N / 3.6 x 107 kg = 2.22222 x 10-3 m/s2

Then I tried to find the time it takes for the ship to hit the reef:
vx = v0x + axt
1.5 = 0 + (2.22222 x 10-3)(t)
t = 675s.

And plugged it into the distance traveled:
x = x0 + v0xt + 1/2 axt2
x = 0 + 0 + 1/2 (2.22 x 10-3)(675)2
x = 505.74375 = 506 m.
Oh, thank you, guys, for correcting my miscalculation.

And if I find the speed to determine if the hull can withstand its impact or not?
vx = v0x + axt
vx = 0 + 2.22222 x 10-3(675)
v = 1.5 m/s
I don't know how to get 0.17 m/s ...
 
! said:
Then I tried to find the time it takes for the ship to hit the reef:
vx = v0x + axt
1.5 = 0 + (2.22222 x 10-3)(t)
t = 675s.

This is the time it takes for the ship to stop, not for it to hit the reef.

You found the right distance and determined that it will hit the reef.
Now you want the speed after it's traveled a certain distance(500m)... you want {v_x}^2= v_{0x}^2 + 2a_x(x-x_0)

Make sure you pick the right distances and forumlae!
 
Last edited:
! said:
And if I find the speed to determine if the hull can withstand its impact or not?
vx = v0x + axt
vx = 0 + 2.22222 x 10-3(675)
v = 1.5 m/s
I don't know how to get 0.17 m/s ...

Why did you take v_0 to be zero? Also, you are using the wrong time. Think careful about what the parameters mean before you plug them in!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top