Who Will Reach the Bottom of the Hill First?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shaunzio
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In a scenario where three individuals descend a hill at angles of 30, 20, and 10 degrees, the person on the 30-degree slope will reach the bottom first, assuming no friction or air resistance. The gravitational force acting down the slope increases with the angle, resulting in greater acceleration and speed for steeper inclines. As the angle increases, the acceleration down the slope also increases, leading to faster transit times. Understanding the relationship between angle and acceleration is crucial for solving such problems. Thus, the person on the steepest slope will complete the descent the quickest.
Shaunzio
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
If there are 3 people going down a hill at different angles but still starting at the same point, who will reach the bottom of the hill first? The first person is going down a slope of 30 degrees. The second person is going down a slope of 20 degrees. And the last person is going down a slope of 10 degrees. Neglect friction.
F=maWell i thought that there was not enough information because you do not know the mass, but since it said to neglect friction then the person on the 30 degree would just be accelerating at gravity. Someone please tell me if I'm rite.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know what a rite is? You should look it up.

Set up the problem of a block sliding down a hill at an angle theta above the horizontal. Find out how the angle affects the transit time from the top to the bottom. Then it will be fairly straight forward to answer the original problem.
 
sorry for my poor grammar but I still don't understand. Would the person at the 30 degree hill reach first since the angle is greater and therefore giving a greater velocity?
 
Did you read the second paragraph?
 
Ok...but I don't know how the angle affects the transit time from the top to the bottom. That's why I came here. If you could tell me that would be great. Thanks.
 
In the absence of friction and air drag, there is only one force, acting parallel to the slope, acting on the persons: the gravitational component acting down the plane. Are you familiar with free body diagrams? Intuitively, if the slope was real small, you wouldn't expect much acceleration or speed; if the slope was steep, you'd expect a lot more acceleration and speed, since speed and acceleration are related by the kinematic equations of motion. As theta increases, the acceleration down the plane increases, and thus the speed increases, independent of the person's mass. You might want to look at this site: www.ac.wwu.edu/~vawter/PhysicsNet/Topics/Dynamics/InclinePlanePhys.html[/URL] . (Scroll down to 'Frictionless incline with no applied forces'). I hope this helps to understand the situation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top