Maximum force on stacked boxes, when we don't want the boxes to slip.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum force that can be exerted on stacked boxes without causing them to slip. The weights of the boxes are M1 = 3 kg and M2 = 4 kg, with static and kinetic friction coefficients provided. Initial calculations for maximum static friction between the boxes yielded 23.52 N, but the correct maximum force is 36.6 N. The solution involves considering both the frictional forces and the acceleration of the boxes, leading to a more complex relationship between the applied force, friction, and the resulting tension in the connecting string. The final calculations clarify the dynamics of the system, ensuring the boxes remain stationary relative to each other.
tomas123
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There are two blocks stacked on top of each other. M2 is on top of M1. M1 = 3 kg. m2 = 4 kg. μs between the two boxes = 0.6. μk between m2 and the floor = 0.2.

Using a rope, we exert a force T on m2, dragging both boxes 5m. What is the maximum force we can exert on m2, if we don't want m2 to slip on m1.

Homework Equations



Fk = μk * n
Fs(max) = μs * n

The Attempt at a Solution



I found Fs(max) between m2 and m1.
Fs(max) = n * μs =
mg * 0.6 =
4kg * 9.8 * 0.6 =
23.52 N.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1 problem! the solution is 36.6 N
 
Sometimes it's helpful to recast the problem into a form that you've seen before, or at least one that makes the interrelationships between the forces more obvious.

Presumably you've calculated the frictional force that the floor exerts upon the bottom box when that box is moving. Call it F1. What's its derivation and value?

Also presumably you've calculated the maximum static frictional force that can be withstood between the boxes before they will slide. Call that F2. What's its derivation and value?

Now redraw the problem placing the boxes separately on the "floor". Connect them with the proverbial "light inextensible string". The tension in that string will represent the frictional force operating between the boxes; If it ever exceeds F2 then the string will snap and the boxes will become unconnected (In the original configuration, they would start to slide).

The first box, M1 has frictional force F1 retarding it and some tension T in the string pulling it forward. The second box M2 has no friction with the floor, but has tension T retarding it and the force of the rope pulling it forward. Can you find an expression for the tension in the connecting string in terms of the force applied by the rope?

attachment.php?attachmentid=39293&stc=1&d=1317050140.gif
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    1.8 KB · Views: 1,874
I get:

max tension = F2 = 23.52 N
Friction F1 = μk * n = 0.2 * 9.8 *7 = 13.72

tension on string = sum of forces on string = F2 - F1 = 37.24 N

The answer is supposed to be 36.6 N. What did I do wrong?

I really appreciate the help!
 
tomas123 said:
I get:

max tension = F2 = 23.52 N
Friction F1 = μk * n = 0.2 * 9.8 *7 = 13.72
Okay, good so far!
tension on string = sum of forces on string = F2 - F1 = 37.24 N
Oops. The frictional forces are not the only ones acting. Unless the applied force is specifically metered to keep the blocks moving at a constant velocity, there will be acceleration and thus inertial forces (m*a) involved for each block. The expression for the tension will be just a bit more complicated because of this.

For the moment, concentrate on box M1 which is being pulled by the string and retarded by friction. If the acceleration of the block is a, what must the tension in the string be?
 
aah I get it!

the sum of F on M1 is 9.8N. Divided by 3kg = 3.267 m/s2.

Sum of F on whole system = force by rope - friction
(7kg * 3.267 m/s2) +13.72 = force by rope
36.589 = force by rope

Thank you!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top