Solve Invertible Skew Symmetric Matrix: Hints & Tips

AI Thread Summary
To solve the exercise involving an invertible skew symmetric matrix A, one approach is to utilize properties of skew symmetric matrices, particularly their eigenvalues and orthogonal diagonalization. It is essential to recognize that the eigenvalues of a skew symmetric matrix are purely imaginary or zero, which can help in finding the required matrices R and R^T. The transformation to the block matrix form can be achieved through a suitable choice of basis that diagonalizes A. This process often involves leveraging the structure of the matrix and applying the spectral theorem for skew symmetric matrices. Ultimately, the goal is to express A in the specified block form using invertible matrices.
Gavroy
Messages
232
Reaction score
0
I am asking for some hints to solve this excercise. Given an invertible skew symmetric matrix $A$, then show that there are invertible matrices $ R, R^T$ such that $R^T A R = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & Id \\ -Id & 0 \end{pmatrix}$, meaning that this is a block matrix that has the identity matrix in two of the four blocks and the lower one with a negative sign.

I am completely stuck!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anyone have a simple method for this? :smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top