Electronegativity vs electrochemical series

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the apparent contradiction between carbon's position in the electrochemical series and its electronegativity as indicated by Pauling values. Carbon is ranked higher than hydrogen in the electrochemical series, suggesting it is more electropositive, yet its electronegativity is higher (2.55 for carbon vs. 2.2 for hydrogen). This raises questions about the relationship between electropositivity and electronegativity, with participants noting that these are different scales and not directly comparable. Additionally, the reactivity of lithium compared to potassium is mentioned, highlighting that lithium has a greater standard electrode potential (Eo) despite being less reactive. The discussion emphasizes the complexity of these chemical properties and the need for careful interpretation of the data.
Miffymycat
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Carbon is higher in the electrochemical series than hydrogen, which indicates it is more electropositive, but Pauling values show carbon as more electronegative - 2.55 vs 2.2!?

Any reason / explanation for the apparent contradiction? Tried looking for an Eo value for C (should be more negative then -0.76V) but no joy ...

Come to that, Li is less reactive than K, but has a greater Eo ...

Thanks in advance for any replies
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Miffymycat said:
Carbon is higher in the electrochemical series than hydrogen, which indicates it is more electropositive

This is comparing apples and oranges. There exist some slight correlation, but these are separate scales.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
I'm trying to find a cheap DIY method to etch holes of various shapes through 0.3mm Aluminium sheet using 5-10% Sodium Hydroxide. The idea is to apply a resist to the Aluminium then selectively ablate it off using a diode laser cutter and then dissolve away the Aluminium using Sodium Hydroxide. By cheap I mean resists costing say £20 in small quantities. The Internet has suggested various resists to try including... Enamel paint (only survived seconds in the NaOH!) Acrylic paint (only...
Back
Top