Question involving beats and finding an unknown frequency.

  • Thread starter Thread starter insertnamehere
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the unknown frequency of a tuning fork using beat frequencies. With a known tuning fork at 262 Hz and an unknown frequency producing 4 beats per second, the participant is unsure how to identify whether the unknown frequency is 258 Hz or 266 Hz. A suggested method involves attaching chewing gum to one fork to lower its frequency and observing changes in the beat frequency. If the beat frequency increases, the unknown frequency is lower than the standard; if it decreases, the unknown frequency is higher. This approach clarifies the relationship between the frequencies and aids in determining the unknown frequency.
insertnamehere
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hello.
I think I have the answer to the following question, but I'm not sure if I got the concept.
You have a standard tuning fork whose frequency is 262 Hz and a second tuning fork with an unknown frequency. When you tap both of them on the heel of one of your sneakers, you hear beats with a frequency of 4 per second. Thoughtfully chewing you gum, your gum, you wonder whether the unknown frequency is 258Hz or 266Hz. How can you decide?

Of course, the beat frequency is the absolute value of the difference between the two frequencies, but in order to decide whether the unknown would be four more or four less than the standard, I get lost here. A hint would be really appreciated. Help!
-thank you very much for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HINT: Attach a small piece of your chewing gum to one of the tuning forks thereby lowering its natural frequency. Then repeat the experiment. What can you infer?
 
So, by lowering that tuning fork's natural frequency and repeating the experiment, I will have to see which tuning fork will continue to give me the beat frequency of 4 beats/second? I'm not sure if I got the concept right...
 
Suppose you lower the frequency of the standard (262 Hz). The beat frequency you would then hear will either be greater than 4 beats per second or less than 4 beats per second - i.e. it would either increase or decrease the frequency separation. What would you infer in either of these cases?
 
Last edited:
ok, so does that mean that it doesn't matter which frequency the unknown tuning fork was?
 
ok, so does that mean that it doesn't matter which frequency the unknown tuning fork was?

No. It is a means by which you can determine whether the unknown frequency of the second tuning fork is greater than or less than that of the standard tuning fork.

Ask yourself:

(a) If the beat frequency increases what does that tell you about the unknown frequency?

(b) If the beat frequency decreases what does that tell you about the unknown frequency?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top