Applications of computational physics?

AI Thread Summary
Computational physics has become increasingly practical due to advancements in computing power and algorithms, enabling complex modeling across various physics research areas. Applications include simulations for materials science, such as analyzing electron structures and dielectric constants, as well as modeling intricate systems like those found in tokamaks using particle-in-cell simulations. Many computational physicists transition to finance, where they apply their skills to model complex, non-linear behaviors. Resources like the American Physical Society provide extensive information on computational physics divisions and their applications. Overall, computational physics plays a crucial role in interpreting experimental data and advancing research across multiple disciplines.
dimensionless
Messages
460
Reaction score
1
What are some of the more practical applications, if there are any, of computational physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually I can think of quite a lot - and this is mostly possible due to the increases in computing power and better algorithms over the last 2 decades.

Here is a good overview from Caltech - http://library.caltech.edu/sherman/collections.htm

Science and engineering memebers of the Materials Research Society publish quite a lot about computational physics as applied to materials - e.g. http://www.mrs.org/meetings/spring2000/program/updsym/ProgramBookO.html

I am sure ZapperZ and Gokul could add quite a bit on this subject.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Computational physics has applications to pretty much all research going on in physics. Typically you can use more complex models to compare with experiment by using computer simulations. I'm doing stuff like this right now involving some probes on a tokamak. The situation in the vicinity of the probe is just too complicated to come up with any sort of decent analytical solution, so it turns out that it is better to use what is called a particle-in-cell (PIC) simulation to model the situation in order to interpret the data collected by the probe.
 
There's huge amount of computational work done in condensed matter physics. Electron structures, dielectric constants and so on..
 
My standard answer in something like this is to to go the American Physical Society website (www.aps.org) and look at the specific division/units under the APS. Practically all branches of physics are represented here. If you go to each of the division/units page, you'll find a wealth of links for that particular field of study.

For example, you'll find this for the Divisionn of Computational Physics

http://www.aps.org/units/dcomp/

Zz.
 
A reasonable number of computational physicists switch fields and work in Wall-Street (or elsewhere in the finance sector) modeling extremely complex, non-linear behavior.

http://guava.physics.uiuc.edu/~nigel/finance.html

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=physicist+finance+modeling&btnG=Google+Search

The point is that, as a computational physicist, you learn to model very tricky stuff. For instance, there's a grad student in my dept. (Physics) using Ising Models and related statistical mechanics methods to simulate and predict geographical variations in socio-economic behavior.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
104
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
610
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top