Solar energy collector formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the formula for designing a solar water heater, specifically the term Qs. The formula ^T=Qs / mC relates the change in water temperature (^T) to energy (Qs), water flow rate (m), and specific heat (C). Qs is identified as the thermal energy or enthalpy involved in heating the water. The user realizes that Qs can be expressed as Q = mcΔT, linking it back to their previous physics knowledge. This clarification helps the user feel more confident in applying the formula for their project.
nina
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I'm stuck on a formula I'm using to design a solar water heater at uni (and no, I'm not a physics student, otherwise I'd probably be kicking myself its such a stupid question) and I understand the theory behind it, I just can't work out what the Qs stands for.

^T=Qs / mC

where ^T= change in water temp,
m= water flow rate in m/kg,
and C= specific heat of the water

I've tried rearranging the formula but it was never my strong point at A level, and the Qs appears to be representing energy, but of what I'm not sure.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Q = mc\DeltaT, where Q would heat (thermal energy/enthalpy), m = mass, c = specific heat, and \DeltaT = differential temperature.

Perhaps in ^T=Qs / mC

Q = energy flux (energy/ unit area) and s = surface area, so that Qs = energy.
 
Thank you!

Now I feel a bit stupid, I knew Q=mc^T from my Physics a couple of years ago, but didnt even see it in this one:rolleyes:

Thanks again for pointing it out.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top