Pulley, Ramp with Moment of Inertia

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving a pulley system with two masses and their respective tensions. Key equations include the moment of inertia, torque, and the summation of forces for each mass. There is confusion regarding the correct application of forces, particularly the inclusion of gravitational forces and the direction of acceleration. Participants emphasize the importance of consistency in the equations used for both masses to derive accurate values for acceleration and tensions. The conversation highlights the need for careful consideration of all forces acting on the system to arrive at the correct solution.
kc0ldeah
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://imgur.com/ZkjXv

The given answers are (b) .309 m/s^2 (c) T1= 7.67N, T2=9.22N

Homework Equations



I_disc = .5(mass_disc)r^2
Sum of Torque = I α
a = r α

The Attempt at a Solution



We will define the system moving right and down as positive to get a positive acceleration.

The tension between mass 1 (2kg) and the pulley is T_1
The tension between mass 2 (6kg) and the pulley is T_2

Summation of Torque = I α = rT_2 - rT_1

plug in: α = a/r and I_disc = .5(mass_disc)r^2

into

I α = rT_2 - rT_1

to get

a(.5)(mass_disc) = T_2 - T_1

The summation of the forces in the x-direction for m1 is: F_x = m1(a) = T_1 - μ(m1)g

T_1 = (m1)a + μmg

How do you define the summation of the forces for m2 and get an expression for T_2?

My first attempt:

Sum of Forces for M2 in x direction:

F_x = (m2)a = T_2 - μ(m2)gcos30

T_2 = (m2)a + μ(m2)gcos30

is incorrect. This was done through rotating the system 30 degrees but the summation for mass 1 was not rotated therefore the equations are not consistent and apparently, wrong. What is the best way to do this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
T_1-μm_1g=m_1a ...1

m_2Sinθ-μm_2Cosθ-T_2=m_2a ...2

r(T_2-T_1)=Iα...3

3 equations with 3 unknowns- a,T1 and T2
Rotating the system make it more complicated.
You should be consistent with direction of acceleration.
 
Last edited:
azizlwl said:
T_1-μm_1g=m_1a ...1

m_2Sinθ-μm_2Cosθ-T_2=m_2a ...2

r(T_2-T_1)=Iα...3

3 equations with 3 unknowns- a,T1 and T2
Rotating the system make it more complicated.
You should be consistent with direction of acceleration.

The equation you gave for T_2 seems to be incorrect. Plugging in .309 for a yields a T_2 of -.725 which is incorrect
 
Bump? Can anyone give some insight?
 
hi kc0ldeah! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)
kc0ldeah said:
F_x = (m2)a = T_2 - μ(m2)gcos30

that's only tension and friction …

what about gravity? :wink:
 
azizlwl said:
T_1-μm_1g=m_1a ...1

m_2Sinθ-μm_2Cosθ-T_2=m_2a ...2

r(T_2-T_1)=Iα...3

3 equations with 3 unknowns- a,T1 and T2
Rotating the system make it more complicated.
You should be consistent with direction of acceleration.

Thousand apologies.
The second equation should be...missing g

m_2gSinθ-μm_2gCosθ-T_2=m_2a ...2
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top