Falling (toppling) rigid tower (uniform rod)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the physics of a rigid vertical tower, modeled as a thin uniform rod, toppling to the ground from a vertical position with its lower end attached to a frictionless axis. The primary goal is to determine the angle of the rod relative to the ground over time, utilizing principles of pendulum motion. The relevant equations of motion involve the pendulum's differential equation and require the initial angular velocity and acceleration due to gravity. The trajectory can be calculated using an integral that, while not solvable in closed form, can be tabulated for specific angles. The analysis emphasizes the moment of inertia and gravitational effects without considering friction or other forces.
zaphat
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am working on an animation, which involves a rigid, vertical tower falling (toppling) to the ground, and I am stuck at its core physics.

Actually this is the same as the thin uniform rod initially positioned in the vertical direction, with its lower end attached to a frictionless axis.


I would need the angle (compared to the ground) of the rod in a given time.

The tower is 50meters long. (It is a simple animation, the effect of gravity only is enough: no friction, no radial acceleration, no stress forces etc. is needed)

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So what have you tried to do to solve your problem?
Here is something to grit your teeth on with regards to moment of inertia.
http://www.uta.edu/physics/courses/wkim/lctr_notes/phys1443-fall06-1116-20(F).pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your tower is a pendulum, whose initial angle from "pointing down" is 180 degree. Starting from the pendulum's differential equation,

<br /> <br /> x&#039;&#039; + a \sin x = 0<br /> <br /> \\<br /> <br /> x&#039;&#039;x&#039; + a (\sin x)x&#039; = 0<br /> <br /> \\<br /> <br /> \frac {x&#039;^2 - {x&#039;}_0^2} {2} - a(\cos x - \cos x_0) = 0<br />

## x_0 = \pi ## (the pendulum is upward from "pointing down"), so

<br /> \\<br /> <br /> x&#039; = \sqrt {{x&#039;}_0^2 + 2a(\cos x + 1)}<br /> <br /> \\<br /> <br /> \int_{\pi}^x ({x&#039;}_0^2 + 2a(\cos x + 1))^{-1/2} dx = t<br />

The latter integral, as far as I can tell, does not exist in the closed form, but it can be tabulated between ## \pi ## (upward) and ## \pi/2 ## (toppled), which will give you the trajectory you want. You will need ## {x'}_0 ## which is the initial angular velocity, and you will need ## a ##, which is ## \frac {3g} {2L} ## for a uniform rod, ## L ## being the length.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top