Flux calculation using Gauss’s Theorem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating electric flux through a cube in a uniform electric field of 300 N/C at a 30º angle. Participants explore the flux through each face of the cube, noting that Gauss's law can be applied to determine net flux. It is suggested that the net flux through the entire surface may be zero, prompting questions about the divergence of the field within the cube. While Gauss's law provides insights, it is acknowledged that direct integration may be necessary for specific face calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding field behavior inside the cube to accurately assess net flux.
manayay
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
qn1.jpg


Qn: A uniform electric field of strength 300 N/C at an angle of
30º with respect to the x-axis goes through a cube of sides
5 cm. (a) Calculate the flux through each cube face:
Front, Back, Left, Right, Top, and Bottom. (b) Calculate
the net flux through the entire surface. (c) An electron is
placed centered 10 cm from the left surface. What is the
net flux through the entire surface? Explain your answer
Ans:
Applying Gauss’s law the net flux can be calculated.
And for option (B), i guess the flux will be 0. But not sure. can anyone explain all the 3 options?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
And for option (B), i guess the flux will be 0. But not sure.
Option B?
That is right, and Gauss gives you the reason (is there divergence of the field inside the cube?).

(a) cannot be solved with Gauss alone, but the integrals are easy to do.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top