Please recommend a good textbook.

  • Thread starter Thread starter djplum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbook
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the challenges faced in a college physics class that lacks a textbook and relies heavily on fast-paced lectures and discussion labs. The student expresses frustration over the teaching methods, which assume prior knowledge of physics and do not adequately prepare them for tests that focus on application rather than theoretical understanding. They seek recommendations for a textbook that emphasizes conceptual physics with graphical representations, particularly for topics like vectors, acceleration, and forces. Suggestions include Hewitt's conceptual physics books, which are noted for their accessibility and inclusion of math problems, as well as other college-level texts like Giancoli and Halliday & Resnick for more in-depth graphical analysis. Additionally, it is mentioned that Hewitt's lectures are available on video, which could provide further support for understanding the material.
djplum
I refuse to do poorly in college physics. I ask you all for help. The way physics is taught where I go, has an hour of lecture and five hours of "discussion labs" with TAs. There is no textbook. We have block notes that don't provide much material. I learn off of handouts. Lecture is pointless, we basically take a quiz and leave every week. He lectures so fast like we don't need to pay attention to detail. He assumes we know everything. He assumes we took high school physics. Well, I didn't. Now I am frustrated and need a great textbook or guide. This is a conceptual physics class. We mostly graph things or draw representations. A book with that sort of thing, how to graph vectors, acceleration, velocity, forces, etc is what I am looking for. Please can you all recommend a textbook that addresses conceptual physics graphically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes, the class is designed that way. we always do a few math based problems with the TA, and we have several activities in DL. But there are problems with the method. There are different discussions assigned during the week, so some groups may be ahead of others, and then you are tested despite some having an unfair advantage. It purely depends on the TA's pace. Also, DL is so crammed with activities and we discuss those plenty, but there is rarely any time for hypothetical questions. Though we use calculus in the discussion, our tests rarely reflect that. THey are more of an application of our knowledge and experience with physics, then with what we do in discussion, which is why I would like a textbook. :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for the suggestions. I think I may go with a Hewitt book. I checked his biography, and he seems to have written all of the books for conceptual physics. Calculus is fine, but I think I need a book that explains the mere basics, most likely hs level. Sometimes I think I should have taken the calculus based class (engineer geared-not my field), just to be able to work with numbers. Thanks again for replying.
 
I teach high school physics, from "bottom-feeder" physical science to AP Physics. FOr first-time physics students, my hands-down favorite text is Hewitt's. The lastest edition (9th high school edition) includes math problems in an appendix. If you want more graphical analysis, you will want a college-level text, like the aforementioned text by Giancoli, or Halliday & resnick, Serway & Vaugn (sp?), or Cutnell and Johnson (this last one being another favorite).

Hewitt also has all his lectures (36 or more of them) on videotape. See if your depatment has them, and if you can borrow them. Warning: after watching Hewitt lecture, you might really start hating your professors!
 
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Back
Top