Number of images formed by 3 mutually perpendicular plane mirrors

AI Thread Summary
In a rectangular room with three mutually perpendicular mirror surfaces (two walls and a ceiling), an observer sees a total of six images, accounting for reflections from the planes, edges, and the corner. For the convex mirror problem, the image formed is virtual and located 15 cm in front of the mirror, based on the calculations provided. The object distance from the convex mirror can be determined using the magnification formula, resulting in the distance being (1-n)f. The sign conventions used in the calculations appear to be correct, although clarity in diagrams can sometimes be an issue. Overall, the discussion revolves around the principles of image formation using mirrors and the application of optics formulas.
Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2
Sir/Madam,
1)The 2 adjacent walls and the ceiling of a rectangular room are mirror surfaced.What is the number of images of himself does an observer sees?
If it was the case of 2 mirrors I know it is 3. But here there are 3 mirrors which are mutually perpendicular. But if we take 2 mirrors at a time then the total number of images is 9. What do you say Sir/Madam?
2)A convergent beam of light is incident on a convex mirror of radius of curvature 60 cm as shown in figure. What is the nature and position of the image formed by it?
I solved it in the following way:
Let u, v and f be the object distance, image distance and focal length of the convex mirror respectively.
Here u = + 10 cm, f = +30 cm
1/u + 1/v = 1/f
v = (uf)/(u-f)
= (10 x 30)/(10 – 30)
= -15 cm
Hence the image formed is virtual and 15 cm in front of the mirror. Is it right?
3)A convex mirror of focal length f produces an image (1/n)th of the size of the object. What is the distance of the object from the mirror?
I solved it in the following way:
Magnification = 1/n = -(v/u)
i.e. v = -(u/n)
1/u + 1/v = 1/f
1/u – (n/u) = 1/f
By solving I get,
u = (1-n)f
Are my sign conventions right? Sometimes the diagram may not be clear. So I will try to describe the diagram. A convergent beam of light serves as a virtual object which appears to converge at a distance of 10 cm behind the mirror.
 

Attachments

  • Opt 2.GIF
    Opt 2.GIF
    1.4 KB · Views: 830
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
On question -1-, I would guess that you get one additional image at the corner of the 3 planes. Since it is a cube corner, you should get a reflection from it back to you in the middle of the room. I don't know if it's a real image, though. Have to try it or else do some ray tracing sketching to figure that out. So you'd get the 3 reflections from the planes, the 2 reflections from the 2 edges, and the 1 from the corner. Is a total of 6 the correct answer for question -1-?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top