Velocity of the rocket with changing mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on expanding the understanding of rocket velocity with changing mass, particularly after the rocket exits the atmosphere. It highlights the importance of the rocket equation and conservation of momentum, suggesting that the mass change is not limited to atmospheric conditions. The conversation also questions the teacher's assertion that mass changes only until the atmosphere is passed, emphasizing that rockets can still accelerate in a vacuum. Additionally, resources for further exploration of the rocket equation and related calculations are provided. Overall, the thread encourages deeper investigation into rocket dynamics beyond initial atmospheric considerations.
annie.hung
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I want to do something about the rocket. I have done the zero gravity point, escape velocity and the velocity of the rocket with constant mass. But I would like to expand it! PLEASE GIVE ME SOME IDEAS!
It probably is not right, but please read through my notes.
1) http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g58/hunghoiyanl6/1.jpg"
2) http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g58/hunghoiyanl6/2.jpg"
3) http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g58/hunghoiyanl6/3.jpg"
3.1) http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g58/hunghoiyanl6/3-1.jpg"
3.2) http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g58/hunghoiyanl6/3-2.jpg"
3.3) http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g58/hunghoiyanl6/3-3.jpg"

My physics teacher said that the mass (fuel) is changing only upto a point where the rocket passes the atmosphere. Afterwards, it will be a freefall process. If so, what other sort of ideas can I expand on it. Please give me some comments on this 'presentation', and give me some other recommandations on what else I can do.
Thank you very much.
Please contact me via email: annie.hung@tsmail.co.uk

Annie
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
annie.hung said:
I want to do something about the rocket. I have done the zero gravity point, escape velocity and the velocity of the rocket with constant mass. But I would like to expand it! PLEASE GIVE ME SOME IDEAS!
It probably is not right, but please read through my notes.
1) http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g58/hunghoiyanl6/1.jpg"
2) http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g58/hunghoiyanl6/2.jpg"
3) http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g58/hunghoiyanl6/3.jpg"
3.1) http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g58/hunghoiyanl6/3-1.jpg"
3.2) http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g58/hunghoiyanl6/3-2.jpg"
3.3) http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g58/hunghoiyanl6/3-3.jpg"

My physics teacher said that the mass (fuel) is changing only upto a point where the rocket passes the atmosphere. Afterwards, it will be a freefall process. If so, what other sort of ideas can I expand on it. Please give me some comments on this 'presentation', and give me some other recommandations on what else I can do.
Thank you very much.
Please contact me via email: annie.hung@tsmail.co.uk

Annie
There are numerous sources on the internet for the derivation of the rocket equation. Some of them are good, and some are not. One that I think does a very good job of setting up the equation in terms of conservation of momentum is found here

http://ed-thelen.org/rocket-eq.html

I think this approach is far superior to anything that involves F = d(M*V)/dt = V*dM/dt + M*dV/dt. This latter equation is only useful under special circumstances. For example, if fuel were being expelled out of both sides of the rocket perpendicular to its direction of motion dM/dt would be the rate of losing mass, but there would be no change in velocity and no net force.

I'm not sure the point your teacher was making about the mass changing only up to the point where the rocket passes the atmosphere. While in the atmosphere there is an effect related to the pressure of the exhausted gas helping to push the rocket. This effect is ignored in the derivation I posted, and it is not needed for the roicket to have thrust. Ships landed on the moon where there is no atmosphere and lifted off again. A rocket does not need atmosphere to accelerate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top