Astronaut-Satellite Separation Calculation

AI Thread Summary
An 80.0 kg astronaut pushes off a 620 kg satellite with a force of 100 N for 0.590 seconds, raising questions about the separation distance after 1.20 seconds. The problem involves Newton's third law, as the astronaut's push results in an equal and opposite reaction from the satellite. To solve it, one should apply conservation of energy to determine the work done and how it translates into kinetic energy, while also considering momentum conservation. Units must be included for clarity, and the time period of 0.590 seconds is crucial for calculations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of showing work to arrive at the final answer.
sunbunny
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
I have no idea how to start this problem:

An 80.0 spacewalking astronaut pushes off a 620 satellite, exerting a 100 force for the 0.590 it takes him to straighten his arms.How far apart are the astronaut and the satellite after 1.20 ?

I know that it involves Newton's 3rd law since the astronaut is applying a force onto the satellite and in turn the satellite pushes back on the astronaut to cause him to move but other that that I'm confused how to solve this problem. If anyone can give me some feedback that would be great!

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, you *must* include units with all of the numbers you list. They are meaningless otherwise.

Next, use conservation of energy to solve it. What work does the astronaut perform in the push? How does that convert into KE? And remember that conservation of momentum will also factor in.
 
Your are correct, Newton's third law is crucial here, but one must also consider Newton's second law, or more specifically the impulse-momentum theorem.

Edit: Berkeman got there first :wink: Is the 0.590 a distance or a time period?
 
sorry about forgetting the units.
An 80.0 kg spacewalking astronaut pushes off a 620kg satellite, exerting a 100N force for the 0.590s it takes him to straighten his arms.How far apart are the astronaut and the satellite after 1.20s ?
 
So now go ahead and use the work/KE/momentum stuff and Hootenanny's suggestion. Show your work -- what answer do you get?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top