Australian Scientists Confirm Past Life On Mars

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nommos Prime (Dogon)
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Life Mars
AI Thread Summary
Australian scientists have confirmed evidence suggesting past life on Mars, sparking interest in the scientific community. This finding aligns with previous claims, including those from Hungarian researchers who reported methane emissions on Mars, indicating potential biological activity. The discussion also references 30 confirmed Mars meteorites found on Earth, which contribute to the ongoing debate about Martian life. Skepticism remains prevalent, as many scientists argue that visual similarities to fossils are insufficient for conclusive evidence. Overall, the topic continues to generate significant discourse regarding the possibility of life beyond Earth.
Nommos Prime (Dogon)
Messages
222
Reaction score
0
http://www.ansto.gov.au/info/press/2004/p02.html
Thought I’d link this article, as I’m quite sure those in the USA didn’t hear about it.

Reminds me of the article I scored from Pravda (Russian newspaper) a few years ago, regarding the Hungarians proving that life exists TODAY on Mars (they quite convincingly used measurements of Methane, a biologically-produced gas, to determine their findings).

Add this finding to those of the other 30 CONFIRMED Mars meteorites, found on Earth;
http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/snc/index.html

Perhaps Hoagland’s claims regarding the “Martian Fossil” found (and pulverised) in front of Opportunity’s cameras, is not so “out there”, after all. His story on the Enterprise Mission website compares this particular fossil to those of Crinoids (found on Earth).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Originally posted by Nommos Prime (Dogon)
http://www.ansto.gov.au/info/press/2004/p02.html
Thought I’d link this article, as I’m quite sure those in the USA didn’t hear about it.
No, I've heard of it and the controversy surrounding the finding did hit the papers here when it first came up. This paper does little to change the minds of those in the scientific community: 'gee, it sure looks like a fossil' isn't good enough. Its still far from a closed question.
Reminds me of the article I scored from Pravda (Russian newspaper) a few years ago, regarding the Hungarians proving that life exists TODAY on Mars (they quite convincingly used measurements of Methane, a biologically-produced gas, to determine their findings).
That requries the false assumptions that the only way to get methane is through a biological process and that methane wouldn't remain very long after its creation. In fact, most of the planets and many of the moons in our solar system have methane (gas, liquid, or solid) on them.
Add this finding to those of the other 30 CONFIRMED Mars meteorites, found on Earth
What exactly does that add? No one is debating that the meteorite came from Mars.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Agree - check out the link Nereid provided for further discussion on this. Thanks
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
11K
Replies
17
Views
8K
Back
Top