Why Is My Calculation of the Dielectric Constant Incorrect?

AI Thread Summary
The calculation of the dielectric constant is based on the formula k=q/(E*A*epsilon_0), where the charge q is 9.6 × 10^-7 C, the electric field E is 4.2 × 10^6 V/m, and the area A is 110 cm². The resulting dielectric constant calculated is approximately 2.3. Additionally, the induced charge on each dielectric surface can be determined using the equation q'=q(1-(1/k)), yielding a value of 5.4 × 10^-7 C. The discussion raises concerns about the accuracy of these calculations, suggesting a potential misunderstanding of the problem setup, particularly regarding the nature of the plates. Clarifying whether the plates are conducting or non-conducting is essential for accurate application of Gauss' law.
roro0505
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
the answer i keep getting is wrong ... help?

Homework Statement



Two parallel plates of area 110 cm2 are given charges of equal magnitudes 9.6 × 10-7 C but opposite signs. The electric field within the dielectric material filling the space between the plates is 4.2 × 106 V/m.

(a) Calculate the dielectric constant of the material.
(b) Determine the magnitude of the charge induced on each dielectric surface.


Homework Equations



k=q/(E*A*epsilon_0)

q'=q(1-(1/k))

The Attempt at a Solution



k=q/(E*A*epsilon_0)
=9.6E-7/(4.2E6*110E-4*8.85E-12)
=2.3

q'=q(1-(1/k))
=9.6E-7(1-(1/2.3))
=5.4E-7
 
Physics news on Phys.org
roro0505 said:
the answer i keep getting is wrong ... help?

Homework Statement



Two parallel plates of area 110 cm2 are given charges of equal magnitudes 9.6 × 10-7 C but opposite signs. The electric field within the dielectric material filling the space between the plates is 4.2 × 106 V/m.

(a) Calculate the dielectric constant of the material.
(b) Determine the magnitude of the charge induced on each dielectric surface.
It is not clear but I suspect that these are non-conducting plates, in which case Gauss' law is:

\oint E dA = E2A = \frac{Q}{k\epsilon_0}

AM
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top