- 1,753
- 143
Let \overrightarrow v and \overrightarrow w be vectors in R3. Prove that \overrightarrow w - {\rm{proj}}_{\overrightarrow v } \overrightarrow w is perpendicular to \overrightarrow v .
Here's my attempt:
\begin{array}{l}<br /> \left( {\overrightarrow w - {\rm{proj}}_{\overrightarrow v } \overrightarrow w } \right) \cdot \overrightarrow v \mathop = \limits^? 0 \\ <br /> \\ <br /> {\rm{proj}}_{\overrightarrow v } \overrightarrow w = \frac{{\overrightarrow v \cdot \overrightarrow w }}{{\left| {\overrightarrow v } \right|^2 }}\overrightarrow v \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \overrightarrow v \cdot \overrightarrow w = v_1 w_1 + v_2 w_2 + v_3 w_3 \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \left| {\overrightarrow v } \right| = \sqrt {v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 } \\ <br /> \left| {\overrightarrow v } \right|^2 = v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \frac{{\overrightarrow v \cdot \overrightarrow w }}{{\left| {\overrightarrow v } \right|^2 }} = \frac{{v_1 w_1 + v_2 w_2 + v_3 w_3 }}{{v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 }} = \frac{{v_1 w_1 }}{{v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 }} + \frac{{v_2 w_2 }}{{v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 }} + \frac{{v_3 w_3 }}{{v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 }} \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \frac{{\overrightarrow v \cdot \overrightarrow w }}{{\left| {\overrightarrow v } \right|^2 }}\overrightarrow v = \left( {\frac{{v_1 w_1 }}{{v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 }} + \frac{{v_2 w_2 }}{{v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 }} + \frac{{v_3 w_3 }}{{v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 }}} \right)\left\langle {v_1 ,\,v_2 ,\,v_3 } \right\rangle \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, = \left( {\frac{{v_1 w_1 }}{{v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 }} + \frac{{v_2 w_2 }}{{v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 }} + \frac{{v_3 w_3 }}{{v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 }}} \right)\left\langle {v_1 ,\,v_2 ,\,v_3 } \right\rangle \\ <br /> \end{array}
Things are starting to get real ugly. Am I missing an easier way?
Here's my attempt:
\begin{array}{l}<br /> \left( {\overrightarrow w - {\rm{proj}}_{\overrightarrow v } \overrightarrow w } \right) \cdot \overrightarrow v \mathop = \limits^? 0 \\ <br /> \\ <br /> {\rm{proj}}_{\overrightarrow v } \overrightarrow w = \frac{{\overrightarrow v \cdot \overrightarrow w }}{{\left| {\overrightarrow v } \right|^2 }}\overrightarrow v \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \overrightarrow v \cdot \overrightarrow w = v_1 w_1 + v_2 w_2 + v_3 w_3 \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \left| {\overrightarrow v } \right| = \sqrt {v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 } \\ <br /> \left| {\overrightarrow v } \right|^2 = v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \frac{{\overrightarrow v \cdot \overrightarrow w }}{{\left| {\overrightarrow v } \right|^2 }} = \frac{{v_1 w_1 + v_2 w_2 + v_3 w_3 }}{{v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 }} = \frac{{v_1 w_1 }}{{v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 }} + \frac{{v_2 w_2 }}{{v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 }} + \frac{{v_3 w_3 }}{{v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 }} \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \frac{{\overrightarrow v \cdot \overrightarrow w }}{{\left| {\overrightarrow v } \right|^2 }}\overrightarrow v = \left( {\frac{{v_1 w_1 }}{{v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 }} + \frac{{v_2 w_2 }}{{v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 }} + \frac{{v_3 w_3 }}{{v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 }}} \right)\left\langle {v_1 ,\,v_2 ,\,v_3 } \right\rangle \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, = \left( {\frac{{v_1 w_1 }}{{v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 }} + \frac{{v_2 w_2 }}{{v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 }} + \frac{{v_3 w_3 }}{{v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2 }}} \right)\left\langle {v_1 ,\,v_2 ,\,v_3 } \right\rangle \\ <br /> \end{array}
Things are starting to get real ugly. Am I missing an easier way?